Re: [Gen-art] GEN-Art NON-review of draft-alvestrand-ipod-02.txt

[Brian E Carpenter <[e-mail]>]

Thanks for taking it in that spirit!

If it's approved, since it's an experiment, we'll find
out who's right in a year...

[e-mail] wrote:
> The GenART review of the -01 version of this draft lead to
> a discussion between a former IETF Chair and the current IETF
> Chair that started out with:
> 
> 
>>However, I am going to take the unusual step of declaring that I'm not
> 
> 
>>going to address a single one of them as a result of Last Call -
> 
> because 
> 
>>in every case, the points you raise are deliberate design choices in
> 
> the 
> 
>>way I constructed IONs.
> 
> 
> On that basis, I see no point in re-reviewing the -02 version.
> This draft is (quite appropriately) in Brian's and Harald's hands
> to deal with - both are experienced experts in the IETF process
> issues that this draft deals with.
> 
> Note: Please do not read this email as pique or annoyance - this
> is a fairly obvious process optimization for a rather unusual draft.
> 
> Thanks,
> --David
> ----------------------------------------------------
> David L. Black, Senior Technologist
> EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
> [phone]             FAX: [phone]
> [e-mail]        Mobile: [phone]
> ----------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
> 

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art