[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-hollenbeck-rfc4933bis-02

Ben Campbell <ben@estacado.net> Mon, 13 July 2009 22:22 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@estacado.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35A4528C5F2; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:22:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2XUeox4RDI1G; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:22:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from estacado.net (estacado-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:266::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBAC228C36C; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:22:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dn3-213.estacado.net (dn3-213.estacado.net [172.16.3.213]) (authenticated bits=0) by estacado.net (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n6DMMbdP078077 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:22:37 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@estacado.net)
Message-Id: <615495A1-0EAE-4E22-865C-57A11FF1DF9E@estacado.net>
From: Ben Campbell <ben@estacado.net>
To: Scott Hollenbeck <shollenbeck@verisign.com>, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3)
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:22:36 -0500
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3)
Cc: Alexey Melnikov <Alexey.Melnikov@isode.com>, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-hollenbeck-rfc4933bis-02
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 22:22:11 -0000

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).

Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

Document: draft-hollenbeck-rfc4933bis-02
Reviewer: Ben Campbell
Review Date: 13 July 2009
IESG Telechat date: 16 July 2009

Summary:

The draft is ready for publication. However, I have a couple of minor  
comments about the implementation report at http://www.ietf.org/IESG/Implementations/RFCs3730-3734_implem.txt 
  that may relate to the progression to draft standard.

(I apologize for not making these comments sooner--this is the first  
progression to draft that I have reviewed, and only recently had  
thoughts on the implementation report.)

Major issues:

None.

Minor issues:


I have a a couple comments about the implementation report. I do not  
necessarily consider them blocking issues; I bring them up merely for  
consideration.

-- The implementation report refers to RFC and draft versions that are  
(at least) a couple of generations old. I assume that the authors  
believe that they also apply to this draft, but it would be good to  
have an explicit assertion of that.

-- It would help to have an explicit assertion whether the report  
author believes the standard meets the requirements to progress to  
draft. I think the report implies a "yes", but it leaves the reader to  
draw that conclusion.

Nits/editorial comments:

None