IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-14

<mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> Mon, 18 June 2018 07:52 UTC

Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 134B4130DE6; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 00:52:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YKAgMadlczL5; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 00:52:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from orange.com (mta135.mail.business.static.orange.com [80.12.70.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13C8A130D7A; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 00:52:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from opfednr06.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.70]) by opfednr26.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id B0D3520810; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 09:52:13 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme2.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.31.66]) by opfednr06.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 833641A0076; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 09:52:13 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::60a9:abc3:86e6:2541]) by OPEXCLILMA1.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::95e2:eb4b:3053:fabf%19]) with mapi id 14.03.0399.000; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 09:52:13 +0200
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
To: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang.all@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-14
Thread-Index: AQHUBgRW2tT5fBANDE2lmzZtMBD5SKRlm5gA
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 07:52:12 +0000
Message-ID: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93302DF467D9@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <152921687734.2071.3843497811933571200@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <152921687734.2071.3843497811933571200@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.168.234.6]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/V6nQ8kNY1UsV5Bvjc99flB4dZOw>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-14
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 07:52:17 -0000

Hi Roni, 

Thank you for double checking. 

As per your comment: 
> I was just wondering why it went from  version -10 to -14

I confirm that the changes since -10 are very minor (mainly fixing some nits). The version bump was a side effect of addressing the OPS directorate review which raised a point related to the NPTv6 part in the module (NPTv6 is defined as Experimental while this draft targets Standards tracks): https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/-kQoJuw7J7d97GaqAoNwjJoKDW8. NPTv6 was reintegrated based on the comment made by B. Claise: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/bXXmrr9VeWXuDBZ-ebyPRSqCHgI 

Cheers,
Med

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Roni Even [mailto:ron.even.tlv@gmail.com]
> Envoyé : dimanche 17 juin 2018 08:28
> À : gen-art@ietf.org
> Cc : draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang.all@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org
> Objet : Genart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-14
> 
> Reviewer: Roni Even
> Review result: Ready
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-??
> Reviewer: Roni Even
> Review Date: 2018-06-16
> IETF LC End Date: 2018-06-28
> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
> 
> Summary:
> The document is ready for publication as a standard track RFC.
> I was just wondering why it went from  version -10 to -14
> 
> Major issues:
> 
> Minor issues:
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email