Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc5987bis-04
Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Thu, 23 February 2017 11:50 UTC
Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEFF812A179; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 03:50:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.986
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.986 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-1.887, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7Xgwjh097oo9; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 03:50:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3AEF012A167; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 03:50:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.34] ([5.10.171.186]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Ldspr-1byUpN0Ip1-00j4zC; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 12:50:50 +0100
To: Stewart Bryant <stewart@g3ysx.org.uk>, gen-art@ietf.org
References: <148785040242.20313.16585453406395577753.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <486e7aed-93dc-c942-13c1-d59bbefc6a99@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 12:50:49 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <148785040242.20313.16585453406395577753.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:K8mDooFqBPoOH2VhrrdiiMhEXxx3fZdlf/sfb/QswCrbslaX4Dm Rza34bhjN4Ic+92cX92BoW6VX8cq1zP5t6XwUEIiqO92VjF2ak2iLj4RzO9Y8+8XPJjHNR9 4Qn62b8KQTULcRaXKvFNyiWXmSDjQ2drZj/XFOePPKX8d27/KOVLmlBZ4xehMu19B6X0pLt mJE8YdtEBXkSfF2nZKniQ==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:tiR0wmaq4cA=:/5B6czKWCEqLJetqdcCQrw 6vpKZ/01ZjVr3/mbn8uwEmkKSuRL6B+v1hZTqpyGq7dB71V7+S5XK0WJ/fxEFvHxxKM640uiH URGUcJ56JqCECu+/Wy8l7DXUzeYPZI/m3T94PQ1SuoLpEwe5j8cQziR4+pdpTE2TVnJUibob8 L8vcbdmYc7zjKD5wLbF8uYGgKs4lpk6OyOnbKwYv6jMRh0jyRiCGWWPP3pdj0L6Pe7yesv8W4 gskyj5tilL3qvNYvq0nzNCyHFck7kjA53JOIk7JFX7XDqjL6di2U2Z6H8H+x8nuwi+EawN3EB GnMRCgxQ7S3qqa3u5WzfU5H2SvPSsdcB5QELjKaEWi6fBbv42+NIgoK4bvOVNHALVf6rJLa1k iUzGDjHzcn2ooromm3zrBAVEslYXCBDGcPcoqte6PyVk2bdY4/Pg77KukaaFhAcu9N3RdjGSX FY/gTlkTIgrjjd6X1LYJCcoD9gNsfgiOrKyXw98P81W2rlNKS58rMiJNj6qqHfm6qAvS0keP7 yboEob9Cnquwu9lqVLkNxM/64XynIAV1PLIl5L34Ih0iMz0ljMvJtkaOlWe3x05v7OGIAhZ3u cw/vVJq/lDtbQZ6Y0HMxF48hfpc6uxeidhRrEdyx/ONwkNACW1qe29TLyqw9L71UY8WoGtHMO zsglc6TipCABAm7IJny7YuaMxFcJCzHqFJ0ng1wXSvnIR89a/AiUHNFBhEZ5h2UIHXTMmU9v+ fAV60NdVOtejS1FbMF7ooTeVPu8ue6MFiPVNBxElAEZw+/9Qi7hlBkzmgfDIfmOYKDBiL6fuU Dz3RHgh
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/VNTpsaGqNCKtsZHw8ihO2sZIriQ>
Cc: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc5987bis.all@ietf.org, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc5987bis-04
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 11:50:56 -0000
Hi Stewart,
thanks a lot.
> ...
> Nits/editorial comments:
>
> Should say
>
> Obsoletes: RFC5987 (if approved) ("RFC" missing)
No. See <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7322#section-4.1.4>.
> Extended notation, using the Unicode characters U+00A3 ("£", POUND
> SIGN) and U+20AC ("€", EURO SIGN):
>
> My European computer can display £ and €, but not sure if all can or
> whether the RFC series supports these symbols. There symbols were not
> present in RFC5987, they were just named.
Yes, that's intentional.
The new RFC format (see RFC 7990 etc) allows the use of non-ASCII
characters for things like I18N related examples and contact
information, and that's exactly how it is used here.
Best regards, Julian
- [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc5987bis… Stewart Bryant
- Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc598… Julian Reschke
- Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc598… Stewart Bryant
- Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc598… Jari Arkko