Re: [Gen-art] Gen-Art LC review of draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-pw-over-bidir-lsp-08
Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com> Fri, 01 July 2016 01:28 UTC
Return-Path: <mach.chen@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BABC12D098; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 18:28:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.647
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.647 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EbmpIaODSuDI; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 18:27:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AE2212B03F; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 18:27:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml705-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CMY84590; Fri, 01 Jul 2016 01:27:54 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SZXEMA411-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.72.70) by lhreml705-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.168) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Fri, 1 Jul 2016 02:27:53 +0100
Received: from SZXEMA510-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.42]) by szxema411-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.82.72.70]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Fri, 1 Jul 2016 09:27:46 +0800
From: Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com>
To: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>, "draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-pw-over-bidir-lsp.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-pw-over-bidir-lsp.all@tools.ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Gen-Art LC review of draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-pw-over-bidir-lsp-08
Thread-Index: AdHSpHs6/fCHt3+gQPyUb5xSik2nfQAkoSjQ
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2016 01:27:45 +0000
Message-ID: <F73A3CB31E8BE34FA1BBE3C8F0CB2AE28CC8925A@SZXEMA510-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <003b01d1d2a4$988704f0$c9950ed0$@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <003b01d1d2a4$988704f0$c9950ed0$@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.111.102.135]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020203.5775C71B.00AD, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.3.42, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 1597b5a0acf8066c2fc60db157c0f86b
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/WALtDBGuJp8L8aLAgBWy2nn6KAM>
Cc: "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-Art LC review of draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-pw-over-bidir-lsp-08
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2016 01:28:00 -0000
Hi Roni, Thanks for your review and comments! Please see some replies inline... > From: Roni Even [mailto:ron.even.tlv@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2016 3:54 PM > To: draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-pw-over-bidir-lsp.all@tools.ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org > Cc: gen-art@ietf.org > Subject: Gen-Art LC review of draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-pw-over-bidir-lsp-08 > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, > please see the FAQ at > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you > may receive. > Document: draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-pw-over-bidir-lsp-08 > > Reviewer: Roni Even > Review Date:2016-6-30 > IETF LC End Date: 2016-7-4 > IESG Telechat date: 2016-7-7 > > Summary: This draft is ready for publication as standard track RFC. > > > Major issues: > > Minor issues: > 1. In section 2.1 "C (Co-routed path) bit: This informs the remote T-PE/S-PEs > about the properties of the underlying LSPs. When set, the remote > T-PE/S-PEs need to select co-routed LSP (as the forwarding tunnel) as the > reverse PSN tunnel. If there is no such tunnel available, it may trigger the > remote T-PE/S-PEs to establish a new LSP." Why are you using non normative > language here "need to" instead of MUST or SHOULD while for the S bit > normative language is used? "SHOULD" seems more proper here. > > > Nits/editorial comments: > 1. In the abstract "TE" is not expanded, only later in the document OK, will expand it in the next revision. Best regards, Mach