Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-07

Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Sat, 08 February 2014 03:55 UTC

Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ED7B1A0342 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 19:55:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.735
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.735 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ro9VtQV-UGyz for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 19:55:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E3A61A0349 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 19:55:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BDJ23580; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 03:55:27 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML402-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.241) by lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.7.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Sat, 8 Feb 2014 03:54:37 +0000
Received: from NKGEML404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.35) by lhreml402-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.241) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Sat, 8 Feb 2014 03:55:23 +0000
Received: from NKGEML501-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.56]) by nkgeml404-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.35]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Sat, 8 Feb 2014 11:55:17 +0800
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
To: Meral Shirazipour <meral.shirazipour@ericsson.com>, "draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization.all@tools.ietf.org>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Gen-ART Last Call draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-07
Thread-Index: Ac8hlCDu13JJMQR2QFirFof+iT/45QC7UqDg
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 03:55:16 +0000
Message-ID: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA43C7B339@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <ABCAA4EF18F17B4FB619EA93DEF7939A32D38FEB@eusaamb107.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <ABCAA4EF18F17B4FB619EA93DEF7939A32D38FEB@eusaamb107.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.138.41.149]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA43C7B339nkgeml501mbschi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-07
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 03:55:32 -0000

Hi, Meral:
Thanks for your comments and proposed changes.
All these changes make sense to me.
Thank you very much.

Regards!
-Qin
From: Meral Shirazipour [mailto:meral.shirazipour@ericsson.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2014 6:32 PM
To: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization.all@tools.ietf.org; gen-art@ietf.org
Subject: Gen-ART Last Call draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-07

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq .

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-07
Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour
Review Date: 2014-02-04
IETF LC End Date:  2014-02-04
IESG Telechat date: NA


Summary:
This draft is ready to be published as Standards Track RFC but I have some minor comments.

Major issues:
N/A
Minor issues:
N/A

Nits/editorial comments:
-[Page 4], Section 1.4,
"used by network manager"---->"used by the network manager"


-[Page 8], Section 4.2,
"In this document, the value I=00 is the reserved value and MUST NOT be used."
It would be good to add if it should be ignored by receiver if used, or discard the whole Synchronization Offset Report ...

-General: would be good to add caption to Figures p.5 and p.7

Best Regards,
Meral
---
Meral Shirazipour
Ericsson Research
www.ericsson.com