IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] [spring] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-ldp-interop-11

"Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com> Mon, 14 May 2018 20:12 UTC

Return-Path: <ginsberg@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E17C12D95B; Mon, 14 May 2018 13:12:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TYiwksmCj8bh; Mon, 14 May 2018 13:12:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 682FC1200C5; Mon, 14 May 2018 13:12:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2860; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1526328733; x=1527538333; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=KeFG4I+adoxqDrbznFXCdjNCjIPJYoaQ5abNMBY1HYw=; b=O2nPV3bhJhwzsuyAFTVSu4sNOXMWShfsqSHeWmh1kSK+yG+Zv9y5eLUO t9Z+4l5ZJK4VFFbeLkiPQ/l4V/U1s3Eh8HJin1BS51eInBAGsPQU21aug oQPV6/bVk0OlfSsL9PLd8b0J5IA41+TTUTFfBIAZFP6nE9hae5O874mFR E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CRAQCr7Pla/5FdJa1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYNDYXsoCotsjHKBeYEPkzKBeAsYC4QDRgKDESE0GAECAQEBAQEBAmwcDIUoAQEBAwEBATg0CwUHBAIBCA4DAwEBAR8QJwsdCAIEAQ0FCIMdgXcID61qiEKCIgWIJYFUP4EOAYMLgxEBAQOBRzyFLgKHXJBaCQKFZYhigT6DZYdUiVWGZwIREwGBJAEcOIFScBU7gkOCSIhIhT5vj1GBGAEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.49,401,1520899200"; d="scan'208";a="113851812"
Received: from rcdn-core-9.cisco.com ([173.37.93.145]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 May 2018 20:12:12 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (xch-rcd-003.cisco.com [173.37.102.13]) by rcdn-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w4EKCCRB005870 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 14 May 2018 20:12:12 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-001.cisco.com (173.36.7.11) by XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (173.37.102.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Mon, 14 May 2018 15:12:11 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-001.cisco.com ([173.36.7.11]) by XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com ([173.36.7.11]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Mon, 14 May 2018 15:12:11 -0500
From: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>
To: Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-ldp-interop.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-ldp-interop.all@ietf.org>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [spring] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-ldp-interop-11
Thread-Index: AQHT675r7HqBmiVlEkS/VLoESDZWzKQvpz+w
Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 20:12:11 +0000
Message-ID: <e53fa35538f042d98bde5e4e82f621d6@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com>
References: <152632807068.10078.4478550408904407310@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <152632807068.10078.4478550408904407310@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.24.122.133]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/WPKYzsNqjaI8t30HZB7bbA_503c>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] [spring] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-ldp-interop-11
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 20:12:16 -0000

Joel -

I am not an author of this draft - but I am an author on the referenced IS-IS draft - which I assume is one of the drafts mentioned in  your comment:

>     Server).  Looking at the relevant routing protocol document, they point to
>     https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-spring-conflict-resolution-05 as the
>     defining source for the SRMS.  

The IGP document references in the ldp-interop draft are stale. Newer versions of the IGP drafts have been published and they no longer reference draft-ietf-spring-conflict-resolution - a draft which is no longer active.

HTH

    Les


> -----Original Message-----
> From: spring <spring-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Joel Halpern
> Sent: Monday, May 14, 2018 1:01 PM
> To: gen-art@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-ldp-interop.all@ietf.org;
> spring@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org
> Subject: [spring] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-
> ldp-interop-11
> 
> Reviewer: Joel Halpern
> Review result: Ready with Issues
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review
> Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for
> the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just like any other last call
> comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-ldp-interop-11
> Reviewer: Joel Halpern
> Review Date: 2018-05-14
> IETF LC End Date: 2018-05-24
> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
> 
> Summary: This document appears to be ready for publication as an RFC.  The
> question of whether it is an Informational RFC or a Proposed Standards track
> RFC is one that the ADs should examine.
> 
> Major issues:
>     This document is quite readable, and quite useful.  If my reading below
>     (minor comment about section 4.2) is wrong, then everything is fine.
>     However, reading the text, it does not appear to define SRMS.  Rather, it
>     describes a good way to use SRMS to achive smooth SR - LDP integration
> and
>     migration.  As such, this seems to me to be a really good Informational
>     Document.
> 
> Minor issues:
>     Section 4.2 states that it defines the SRMS (Segment Routing Mapping
>     Server).  Looking at the relevant routing protocol document, they point to
>     https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-spring-conflict-resolution-05 as the
>     defining source for the SRMS.  And that document does appear to define
> the
>     SRMS.
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email