[Gen-art] Re: [pim] draft-ietf-pim-ipv6-zeroconf-assignment-12 ietf last call Genart review
Peter Yee <peter@akayla.com> Thu, 08 October 2026 15:59 UTC
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (mail3.g24.pair.com [66.39.134.11]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C58250; Thu, 08 Oct 2026 15:59:26 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: mx.ietf.org; dkim=pass header.d=akayla.com header.s=pair-202402141610 header.b=breyXh26; spf=pass (mx.ietf.org: domain of peter@akayla.com designates 66.39.134.11 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=peter@akayla.com; dmarc=none
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBA4E16047A; Thu, 8 Oct 2026 11:59:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.168.225] (server.houseofyee.com [173.8.184.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 42D98126F12; Thu, 8 Oct 2026 11:59:19 -0400 (EDT)
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.113.26091740
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2026 08:59:16 -0700
From: Peter Yee <peter@akayla.com>
To: "Karstens, Nate" <Nate.Karstens@garmin.com>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <53DC3231-5124-4A33-BBAD-0E2624774A4A@akayla.com>
Thread-Topic: [pim] draft-ietf-pim-ipv6-zeroconf-assignment-12 ietf last call Genart review
References: <179126056725.296333.12275206801827357724@dt-datatracker-6f6546fbc7-hm9tb> <MN2PR04MB7087C35DCA21BAFC0FF4025A9C932@MN2PR04MB7087.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR04MB7087C35DCA21BAFC0FF4025A9C932@MN2PR04MB7087.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3874294759_1473579836"
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akayla.com; h=date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type; s=pair-202402141610; bh=vk/L8Wwo942Kar3pKqCQIPBqi76JsXVR8DPhL6MPy/U=; b=breyXh26jIsMcLWEiKBkKj88XAQ9cd0TfiosGQSwnx7RQh22XnIir/oRiar87kn6n1vC+AiH0LS29ZNRzw8Oa6+IPAzyWOf9xMGP7W8uN56dS1inmksfxgFznVp9Kr4w3Ogz/QvGWeL6ntPLQb4ekG+Ob/HZqlOEgEm2L9+42+holw9C79hcIePSDM7fB1nPSubqHov0uRnhYmYpUCUUhYIAkkpNvGO0JT7TgRYIK/C1HZa5dpJQnYqRllKnLrreI0Pijf9UPmz0N6waIwckLh90IB6JslK8JSlfw3ITkMDnnrvqBg6yngcrfU9Ou/zFwQMHvtNY3vof7vaATXmdHg==
X-Scanned-By: mailmunge 3.11 on 66.39.134.11
X-Spamd-Bar: ------------------
Message-ID-Hash: 7WY3F743QIOMKW4XHF7ULACBBW2KRUAM
X-Message-ID-Hash: 7WY3F743QIOMKW4XHF7ULACBBW2KRUAM
X-MailFrom: forwardingalgorithm@dmarc.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; header-match-gen-art.ietf.org-0; header-match-gen-art.ietf.org-1; header-match-gen-art.ietf.org-2; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: "draft-ietf-pim-ipv6-zeroconf-assignment.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pim-ipv6-zeroconf-assignment.all@ietf.org>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>, "pim@ietf.org" <pim@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10
Precedence: list
Subject: [Gen-art] Re: [pim] draft-ietf-pim-ipv6-zeroconf-assignment-12 ietf last call Genart review
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/WatYsPS2umoNKTGuDG47UL6ZFKo>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:gen-art-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gen-art-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gen-art-leave@ietf.org>
Thanks for addressing my concerns, Nate. Looks good to me. -Peter On 10/8/26, 7:46 AM, "Karstens, Nate" <Nate.Karstens@garmin.com> wrote: Thanks, Peter! We submitted draft-ietf-pim-ipv6-zeroconf-assignment-13 (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pim-ipv6-zeroconf-assignment/) to address your feedback. Please see responses below. Cheers, Nate From: Peter Yee via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Sent: Monday, October 5, 2026 23:23 To: gen-art@ietf.org Cc: draft-ietf-pim-ipv6-zeroconf-assignment.all@ietf.org; last-call@ietf.org; pim@ietf.org Subject: [pim] draft-ietf-pim-ipv6-zeroconf-assignment-12 ietf last call Genart review Document: draft-ietf-pim-ipv6-zeroconf-assignment Title: Zero-Configuration Assignment of IPv6 Multicast Addresses Using mDNS Reviewer: Peter Yee Review result: Ready with Issues I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Document: draft-ietf-pim-ipv6-zeroconf-assignment Title: Zero-Configuration Assignment of IPv6 Multicast Addresses Using mDNS Reviewer: Peter Yee Review result: Ready with Issues I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ__;!!EJc4YC3iFmQ!TKas4oDACX5ScSCtujRR-jerc5WQ8Mb8qn_7a0oWlD_SvlnZnox2juPey8V_VhTkEp2txb5wVdJZqFSXCQ$>. Document: draft-ietf-pim-ipv6-zeroconf-assignment-12 Reviewer: Peter Yee Review Date: 2026-10-05 IETF LC End Date: 2026-10-06 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: This draft is well written, specifying a means of using mDNS in the dynamic assignment of IPv6 multicast addresses. While I have no major issues with the document, I do have some questions that I’ve noted as minor issues. [Ready with issues] Major issues: None Minor issues: Page 6, section 2.7, 2nd sentence: How does the host network stack notify the application that a multicast Ethernet/IPv6 address has been detected? NK> This is an implementation detail, but many mDNS implementations use APIs where the caller provides a callback to execute when a given action is complete. With the mdns-zeroconf-mcast proof-of-concept mentioned in §7, Avahi gives a callback on line 113 that indicates the address registration was successful (https://github.com/nkarstens/mdns-zeroconf-mcast/blob/5478b2dd7325a7384fcc0b10ec191501b8c9e376/mdns-zeroconf-mcast.c#L113) Page 8, 1st paragraph: Some network infrastructure components are not capable of publishing veto records. The example component given in section 3.1, 1st paragraph is a network switch, which might not have a network stack above layer 2. NK> Practically speaking, switches that support multicast snooping need to be managed switches, with their own host. Nits/editorial comments: General: It would be better to use a section number or a combination of section number and section name for links because not all RFC formats support hyperlinks, and it may not be obvious that a capitalized section name in a sentence is supposed to indicate a link. I notice this because I review using the text version of the draft. Obviously, this doesn't matter when using the HTML version. Specific: Page 4, last paragraph before section 2.1: change the colon to a period. NK> Done! Page 10, section 5.1, 2nd paragraph, 1st sentence: change “signficant” to “significant”. NK> Done! _______________________________________________ pim mailing list -- pim@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to pim-leave@ietf.org CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and contain information that may be Garmin confidential and/or Garmin legally privileged. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and delete the message. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this communication (including attachments) by someone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. Thank you.
- [Gen-art] draft-ietf-pim-ipv6-zeroconf-assignment… Peter Yee via Datatracker
- [Gen-art] Re: [pim] draft-ietf-pim-ipv6-zeroconf-… Karstens, Nate
- [Gen-art] Re: [pim] draft-ietf-pim-ipv6-zeroconf-… Peter Yee