[Gen-art] Re: [Fwd: Gen-art last call review of draft-ietf-webdav-rfc2518bis-17.txt]
Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Sat, 10 March 2007 08:55 UTC
Return-path: <gen-art-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HPxM1-0003tz-AK; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 03:55:05 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HPxLz-0003tl-81 for gen-art@ietf.org; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 03:55:03 -0500
Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HPxLu-0001He-Ql for gen-art@ietf.org; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 03:55:03 -0500
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 10 Mar 2007 08:54:57 -0000
Received: from p508F96CB.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO [192.168.178.22]) [80.143.150.203] by mail.gmx.net (mp044) with SMTP; 10 Mar 2007 09:54:57 +0100
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/L9KFxdELLgEX1WmUXi5v47TLdpFiPjp2r+SLLMu ea4P7kQ28MtX3+
Message-ID: <45F2725F.8070601@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 09:54:55 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.8.0.4) Gecko/20060516 Thunderbird/1.5.0.4 Mnenhy/0.7.4.666
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: WebDAV <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
References: <45BF4703.2010906@gmx.de> <45C5ACEC.4050304@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <45C5ACEC.4050304@gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: ea4ac80f790299f943f0a53be7e1a21a
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org
Subject: [Gen-art] Re: [Fwd: Gen-art last call review of draft-ietf-webdav-rfc2518bis-17.txt]
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org
Julian Reschke schrieb: >> From: Elwyn Davies <elwynd@dial.pipex.com> >> To: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org> >> Subject: Gen-art last call review of draft-ietf-webdav-rfc2518bis-17.txt > ... >> s9.2: I think I know what 'document order' means but it isn't actually >> defined. > > That's a good catch. REC-XML doesn't define nor use it. REC-XPATH uses > it, but doesn't define it. Advice needed. > ... It just occurred to me that the statement Elwyn was referring to is broken anyway. Currently it says (<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-webdav-rfc2518bis-18.html#rfc.section.9.2.p.4>): Servers MUST process PROPPATCH instructions in document order (an exception to the normal rule that ordering is irrelevant). The issue here is that we're not talking about "PROPPATCH instructions", but the child elements of DAV:propertyupdate. Proposed fix (see also <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-reschke-webdav-rfc2518bis-latest.html#rfc.issue.proppatch-document-order>): Servers MUST process the child elements of the propertyupdate XML element in the order they appear in the request body (an exception to the normal rule that ordering is irrelevant). Best regards, Julian _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
- [Gen-art] Gen-art last call review of draft-ietf-… Elwyn Davies
- [Gen-art] Re: [Fwd: Gen-art last call review of d… Elwyn Davies
- [Gen-art] Re: [Fwd: Gen-art last call review of d… Julian Reschke
- [Gen-art] Re: [Fwd: Gen-art last call review of d… Julian Reschke
- [Gen-art] Re: [Fwd: Gen-art last call review of d… Lisa Dusseault
- [Gen-art] Confidentiality of lock information (Bu… Julian Reschke
- [Gen-art] Unlocking notifications (BugZilla issue… Julian Reschke
- [Gen-art] Re: [Fwd: Gen-art last call review of d… Julian Reschke