Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-geopriv-held-measurements-07.txt
Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@skype.net> Wed, 12 June 2013 16:23 UTC
Return-Path: <martin.thomson@skype.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04F0321E804D for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 09:23:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.932
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.932 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.333, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3-CgqsJgt57Z for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 09:23:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2lp0240.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.240]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CBF411E80E8 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 09:23:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BY2FFO11FD017.protection.gbl (10.1.15.202) by BY2FFO11HUB030.protection.gbl (10.1.14.115) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.707.0; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 16:23:37 +0000
Received: from TK5EX14MLTC102.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (131.107.125.37) by BY2FFO11FD017.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.1.14.105) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.707.0 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 16:23:37 +0000
Received: from TK5EX14MBXC253.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([169.254.3.236]) by TK5EX14MLTC102.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.79.180]) with mapi id 14.03.0136.001; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 16:23:21 +0000
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@skype.net>
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>, Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>
Thread-Topic: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-geopriv-held-measurements-07.txt
Thread-Index: AQHOZg9SypXMqLPm9kq1DhKEqtmivpkxk9KAgACx7QA=
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 16:23:19 +0000
Message-ID: <88EA7D224AA4F24F9D7628368F7572A911CCF222@TK5EX14MBXC253.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <51B625D8.6020402@ericsson.com> <B22B5CA9-6D5C-45F9-B0F4-7251CD1A3C1B@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <B22B5CA9-6D5C-45F9-B0F4-7251CD1A3C1B@piuha.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [157.54.51.75]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:131.107.125.37; CTRY:US; IPV:CAL; IPV:NLI; EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(24454002)(51704005)(377454002)(13464003)(189002)(45984002)(199002)(479174002)(85664002)(77096001)(20776003)(74502001)(76786001)(54356001)(66066001)(74662001)(77982001)(59766001)(6806003)(79102001)(54316002)(74706001)(56776001)(76796001)(80022001)(65816001)(56816003)(74876001)(74366001)(47776003)(81342001)(55846006)(23726002)(63696002)(4396001)(50466002)(31966008)(47446002)(16406001)(81542001)(50986001)(47976001)(46102001)(33656001)(46406003)(76482001)(49866001)(69226001)(47736001)(44976003)(15202345002)(53806001)(51856001); DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2FFO11HUB030; H:TK5EX14MLTC102.redmond.corp.microsoft.com; CLIP:131.107.125.37; RD:InfoDomainNonexistent; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.onmicrosoft.com
X-Forefront-PRVS: 08756AC3C8
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-geopriv-held-measurements.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-geopriv-held-measurements.all@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-geopriv-held-measurements-07.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 16:23:48 -0000
Correct. There are a number of DISCUSS positions that will be resolved by -08. I haven't read all the DISCUSS material yet, but I expect that there will need to be a few more edits to catch the rest of them. I'll have to coordinate with Richard to determine when to ship -08. I don't want to interfere with AD reviews. > -----Original Message----- > From: Jari Arkko [mailto:jari.arkko@piuha.net] > Sent: Tuesday, 11 June, 2013 22:45 > To: Suresh Krishnan > Cc: draft-ietf-geopriv-held-measurements.all@tools.ietf.org; General Area > Review Team > Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-geopriv-held- > measurements-07.txt > > Thank you very much for the review, Suresh. I followed your discussion with > Martin, and the conclusions seem correct to me. But I don't think we should > approve the draft until the -08 appears. Martin? > > Jari > > On Jun 10, 2013, at 2:15 PM, Suresh Krishnan > <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com> wrote: > > > I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) > > reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see > > http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). > > > > Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before > > posting a new version of the draft. > > > > Document: draft-ietf-geopriv-held-measurements-07.txt > > Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan > > Review Date: 2013/06/10 > > IESG Telechat date: 2013/06/13 > > > > > > Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as a Proposed > > Standard, but I had a few minor comments as identified in my last call > > review dated 2013/05/08. The authors had agreed to fix the following > > issues but I have not seen an updated draft yet. > > > > Minor > > ===== > > > > * Section 5.2 > > > > - The Interface-Id option is the DHCPv6 equivalent of the circuit > > identifier defined in RFC3046. Please add a reference to Section 22.18 > > of RFC3315 that describes this option. > > > > - Is there any specific reason that the giaddr is being specified > > using the IPv4-mapped IPv6 address format? From my reading giaddr is > > of type bt:ipAddressType and it allows specification of both IPv4 and > > IPv6 addresses natively. > > > > * Section 8.7 Page 53 > > > > I think there may be an off-by-one error here. > > > > <xs:maxInclusive value="268435456"/> > > > > Shouldn't this be > > > > <xs:maxInclusive value="268435455"/> > > > > so that the largest value will fit in 28 bits? > > > > Thanks > > Suresh > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Gen-art mailing list > > Gen-art@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art >
- [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-g… Suresh Krishnan
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ie… Jari Arkko
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ie… Martin Thomson