[Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call Review of draft-hoffman-alt-streams-tracker-13
Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Fri, 29 April 2011 17:41 UTC
Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48E12E06A1; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 10:41:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32K1edM9B-45; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 10:41:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rufus.isode.com (rufus.isode.com [62.3.217.251]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1168E069F; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 10:41:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [188.29.46.57] (188.29.46.57.threembb.co.uk [188.29.46.57]) by rufus.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPA id <Tbr4LABK43TI@rufus.isode.com>; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 18:41:01 +0100
Message-ID: <4DBAF7F9.1040809@isode.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 18:40:09 +0100
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
To: draft-hoffman-alt-streams-tracker.all@tools.ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "gen-art@ietf.org Review Team" <gen-art@ietf.org>
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call Review of draft-hoffman-alt-streams-tracker-13
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 17:41:08 -0000
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document: draft-hoffman-alt-streams-tracker-13 Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 2011-04-29 IESG Telechat date: unknown Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC. Major issues: None Minor issues: None Nits/editorial comments: 2.1. States for the IAB Stream o Dead IAB Document -- This document was an active IAB document, but for some reason it is no longer being pursued for the IAB stream. It is possible that the document might be revived later. Is it worth adding: ", possibly in another stream" to make the text the same with a similar text in Section 3.1: 3.1. States for the IRTF Stream o Dead IRTF Document -- This document was an active IRTF document, but for some reason it is no longer being pursued for the IRTF stream. It is possible that the document might be revived later, possibly in another stream. ? 4.1. States for the Independent Submission Stream o No Longer In Independent Submission Stream -- This document was actively considered in the Independent Submission stream, but the ISE chose not to publish it. It is possible that the document might be revived later. I think it would be good to mention here that the reason should be recorded in the comments, because this state seems to cover both abandoning the document and moving it to another stream. ID-nits reports: Miscellaneous warnings: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- The document has a disclaimer for pre-RFC5378 work, but was first submitted on or after 10 November 2008. Does it really need the disclaimer? Checking references for intended status: Informational ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- == Outdated reference: draft-juskevicius-datatracker-wgdocstate-reqts has been published as RFC 6175 == Outdated reference: draft-ietf-proto-wgdocument-states has been published as RFC 6174 RFC Editor usually fixes these automatically, but if you are going to revise the draft, you might as well fix these at the same time.
- [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call Review of draft-hoffm… Alexey Melnikov