RE: [Gen-art] Gen-Art review of draft-kosonen-mobile-xmf-mimetype-01.txt

John,

Can you please clarify which document/version this review applies to
(i.e, mimetype-00 or mediatype-01)?

Thanks,
Mary

-----Original Message-----
From: john.loughney@nokia.com [mailto:john.loughney@nokia.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 5:12 AM
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: hardie@qualcomm.com; timo.kosonen@nokia.com; mma@midi.org
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-Art review of
draft-kosonen-mobile-xmf-mimetype-01.txt

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for
draft-kosonen-mobile-xmf-mediatype-01.txt.
For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html>.

Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

I would suggest that a DISCUSS be issued on the document, based upon
the four points below.  These should be relatively easy to fix, though.

1) The abstract has references and some abbreivatiations, for example
XMF.
   I would suggest to rewrite the abstract without the references, and
   expand XMF, so that readers unfamiliar with the details would at
least
   understand (at a high-level) what the document is trying to do.

2) IANA Considerations section should explicitly state the MIME subtype
details,
   and information into which registry it should be placed.

3) Security considerations section - would general MIME threats be
applicable for
   this document?

4) What is meant by the "Change controller:" section?

thanks,
John

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art