RE: [Gen-art] Heavy load this week

john.loughney@nokia.com Fri, 23 September 2005 14:35 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EIoeZ-0004nB-Mf; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 10:35:55 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EIoeY-0004n1-HF for gen-art@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 10:35:54 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA18774 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 10:35:52 -0400 (EDT)
From: john.loughney@nokia.com
Received: from mgw-ext04.nokia.com ([131.228.20.96]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EIokv-0008Mf-PC for gen-art@ietf.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 10:42:31 -0400
Received: from esebh105.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh105.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.211]) by mgw-ext04.nokia.com (Switch-3.1.7/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id j8NEXcMx008319; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 17:33:40 +0300
Received: from esebh104.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.143.34]) by esebh105.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 23 Sep 2005 17:35:47 +0300
Received: from esebe100.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.138.118]) by esebh104.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 23 Sep 2005 17:35:46 +0300
x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [Gen-art] Heavy load this week
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 17:35:45 +0300
Message-ID: <1AA39B75171A7144A73216AED1D7478DF9263D@esebe100.NOE.Nokia.com>
Thread-Topic: [Gen-art] Heavy load this week
Thread-Index: AcXAPGRRNgTWmsbTTMmD7knH+dEZ8wAD540A
To: brc@zurich.ibm.com, gen-art@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Sep 2005 14:35:46.0615 (UTC) FILETIME=[15D36470:01C5C04C]
X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 52e1467c2184c31006318542db5614d5
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc:
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org

Has the actual assignment gone out yet? I haven't seen it.

John 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org 
>[mailto:gen-art-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of ext Brian E Carpenter
>Sent: 23 September, 2005 05:42
>To: gen-art@ietf.org
>Subject: [Gen-art] Heavy load this week
>
>For whatever statistical reason, there's a heavy load (28) of 
>drafts on next week's agenda.
>
>Can I suggest giving priority to standards track items as much 
>as possible?
>
>Also note that I have already voted NO OBJECTION on 
>draft-ietf-dhc-3315id-for-v4-05.txt
>draft-ietf-dhc-relay-agent-ipsec-02.txt (well, that was 
>Harald's vote) draft-ietf-opes-smtp-use-cases-03.txt
>
>Also, I am recused on draft-carpenter-bcp101-update-01.txt
>And that one certainly doesn't need *technical* review.
>
>That would cut it to 13 drafts needing review.
>
>Thanks
>     Brian
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Gen-art mailing list
>Gen-art@ietf.org
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
>

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art