Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-mahesh-mef-urn-01.txt

Thanks again for your review, Francis!

Based on the review, I have posted a no-objection vote for the document in this week’s IESG telechat, but it would be good to get an acknowledgment from the authors that they’ve seen the editorial observations from Francis.

Jari

On 01 Feb 2016, at 16:36, Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr> wrote:

> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-mahesh-mef-urn-01.txt
> Reviewer: Francis Dupont
> Review Date: 2016-01-25
> IETF LC End Date: 2016-02-04
> IESG Telechat date: 2016-02-04
> 
> Summary: Ready
> 
> Major issues: None
> 
> Minor issues: None
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> - I was first surpised there is no explanation about the MEF acronym
>  but it is also the case on the Web site so IMHO it was Metro Etherner
>  Forum at the beginning and it lost this meaning when it extended to
>  Carrier Ethernet... So I have no concern about the lack of MEF expansion/
>  introduction/etc.
> 
> - 2 page 3: the RFC 3406 is not very clear about the value to put
>  in the registration date. It seems you put the date of the first
>  instance of the document. Anyway the IANA and/or the RFC Editor
>  shall fix the date if needed...
> 
> - Author's Address page 5: please add +1 in front of your phone number.
>  (note this is the only action on your side)
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr
> 
> PS: the document has been push on the IESG agenda since I read it.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-mahesh-mef-urn-01.txt

Attachment: signature.asc