Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-pwe3-static-pw-status-10
Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Mon, 30 April 2012 18:32 UTC
Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD4AB21F88F4; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:32:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.467
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.467 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.133, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r7y2YUjxQnNV; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:32:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 262F621F88F1; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:32:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.33] (cpe-76-187-92-156.tx.res.rr.com [76.187.92.156]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q3UIWHb9039603 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 30 Apr 2012 13:32:18 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F9ECB13.3040001@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 13:32:26 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <74F09118-B4F8-4C4D-8B91-ACD487ED0598@nostrum.com>
References: <ED4FC298-44C1-409D-9D0A-01CA75E14059@nostrum.com> <4F9ECB13.3040001@cisco.com>
To: stbryant@cisco.com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257)
Received-SPF: pass (nostrum.com: 76.187.92.156 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Cc: "gen-art@ietf.org Review Team" <gen-art@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-pwe3-static-pw-status.all@tools.ietf.org, The IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-pwe3-static-pw-status-10
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 18:32:20 -0000
On Apr 30, 2012, at 12:25 PM, Stewart Bryant wrote: > Hi Ben > > Thank you for your review. > > The IANA policy is stated as IETF Review (end of first para in IANA) Okay, I guess I just missed it. > > The normative text is deliberate - this was part of the change that we needed to make. > Then as a reviewer, I think the proposed text is a bit confusing, as a paragraph describing how one element operates seems to make a normative requirement on the behavior of a different element. It would be better to make that assertion in the description of behavior for that other element. This is not a big deal, and certainly not a show stopper if people are attached to the current approach. It's just a personal opinion. (Sorry, I'd offer more specifics, but am not in a position to pull up the text at the moment, so I'm responding from memory. I will look again when I get the chance.) Thanks! Ben.
- [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-pwe3-st… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-pwe… Stewart Bryant
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-pwe… Ben Campbell