IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-03

"Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Fri, 25 August 2017 13:50 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F48813293F for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 06:50:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); domainkeys=pass (1024-bit key) header.from=ietf@kuehlewind.net header.d=kuehlewind.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wIhEt4oytpKm for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 06:50:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kuehlewind.net (kuehlewind.net [83.169.45.111]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78D2013238E for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 06:50:43 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=kuehlewind.net; b=TGbJMPcIT0JmyiO6kUImrXu3Xzm3c2GPenaTXa1IcotBQOeYbO3LcT3dl3mtQx8XxpPI1UqOXzhHLntPgW3mObfjjNNaq+vWGXdhsUEN/3lLNSLxQsCq9fAgB6GYJm4zvl7zwP/Uyqea8j8kFr6Gom8jWpLkBLyeU+z9hlAI464=; h=Received:Received:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To:X-Mailer:X-PPP-Message-ID:X-PPP-Vhost;
Received: (qmail 26384 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2017 15:50:41 +0200
Received: from pd9e11dec.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (HELO ?192.168.178.33?) (217.225.29.236) by kuehlewind.net with ESMTPSA (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted, authenticated); 25 Aug 2017 15:50:41 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: "Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
In-Reply-To: <150263205807.26527.8869013927407425945@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 15:50:40 +0200
Cc: gen-art <gen-art@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <64F021F9-09C0-4CF2-BCF5-9F9DFFDAF25A@kuehlewind.net>
References: <150263205807.26527.8869013927407425945@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
X-PPP-Message-ID: <20170825135041.26379.5902@lvps83-169-45-111.dedicated.hosteurope.de>
X-PPP-Vhost: kuehlewind.net
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/a0mitMNSPEsz24qn67bzsXHen58>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-03
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 13:50:45 -0000

Hi Roni, thanks for the review!


> Am 13.08.2017 um 15:47 schrieb Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>:
> 
> Reviewer: Roni Even
> Review result: Ready with Nits
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-??
> Reviewer: Roni Even
> Review Date: 2017-08-13
> IETF LC End Date: 2017-08-24
> IESG Telechat date: 2017-08-31
> 
> Summary: The document is ready for publication as standard track RFC
> 
> I read all the document and also did a compare with RFC6006 to look at the
> changes.
> 
> Major issues:
> 
> Minor issues:
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> 
> 1. In section 4.2 I am not sure why is this sentence there, is it for the
> current yang document or for a future one. Why have it at all?-"The PCEP YANG
> module [I-D.ietf-pce-pcep-yang] can be extended to also include the P2MP
> related parameters."
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email