[Gen-art] (full) review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-datagram-plpmtud-15.txt

[Francis Dupont <[e-mail]>]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-tsvwg-datagram-plpmtud-15.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20200311
IETF LC End Date: 20200310
IESG Telechat date: unknown

Summary: Ready

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None

Nits/editorial comments:
 - ToC page 3 and 7 page 35: Acknowledgements -> Acknowledgments
  (note the word has inconsistent spelling (i.e. US and UK) in
   the document, I put here the UK spelling, preferring the US one).

 - 4.3 page 15, 5.3.1 page 27, 6.1.1 page 30, 6.3 page 34:
   acknowledgement -> acknowledgment

 - 4.6.2 pages 18 and 19: (e.  g.  -> (e.g.,

 - 5.1.4 page 24 "Error": e.g. -> e.g.,

 - 6.2.3 page 33: [RFC8261] . -> [RFC8261].

 - 10.1 page 36: I suggest to move the I-D normative reference to the
  end of the list, expecting it will get a greater RFC number...

I suggest to run a spell checker with the wanted English variant to track
words from the other one.

Note these comments are about very small editorial points so you can
(should?) consider to leave them to the RFC Editor.

Regards

[e-mail]

PS: I looked at the version 16: I have no new comment other the wording
about the anti-pattern could be improved.