[Gen-art] review: draft-sheffer-rfc6982bis-01
Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Thu, 26 May 2016 22:07 UTC
Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3276112D1B6; Thu, 26 May 2016 15:07:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.722
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.722 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=joelhalpern.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VbES_bGwuYEv; Thu, 26 May 2016 15:07:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailb2.tigertech.net (mailb2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.154]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22C0012D109; Thu, 26 May 2016 15:07:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailb2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07A08FC0184; Thu, 26 May 2016 15:07:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=joelhalpern.com; s=1.tigertech; t=1464300469; bh=Nh4K5qPWeJjvymjKa/K+Nzm3vJ8TJweeQ4juCktxYIg=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=p9SoTCtzHSvmxkzZGtTO+my+vpMnv9kfruSAQidbmIVaS85n4Yn9u2csO78nai/J/ ePLh/1EIZR0biN9T7+CDRCYVuX9GuSg0BIGjQAxBZSVtXTGn8uIDF8HzWOTvIf/vvi 2/5zi+O+RL1W4+8V9duW/aSM/hAJ08gVSI0Rhmp0=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at b2.tigertech.net
Received: from Joels-MacBook-Pro.local (209-255-163-147.ip.mcleodusa.net [209.255.163.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailb2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7F0C61C0146; Thu, 26 May 2016 15:07:48 -0700 (PDT)
To: "A. Jean Mahoney" <mahoney@nostrum.com>, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, draft-sheffer-rfc6982bis@ietf.org
References: <57152222.1020804@nostrum.com> <571A4CDA.800@joelhalpern.com>
From: Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Message-ID: <37398396-7f28-eaed-de51-a8b37b0c8c4e@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 18:07:33 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <571A4CDA.800@joelhalpern.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/aeLnX8Zv4QWanP9QaIRFN_h6RHo>
Subject: [Gen-art] review: draft-sheffer-rfc6982bis-01
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 22:07:54 -0000
This revision (-01) represents a reasonable effort to address my concerns. My thanks to the author. The document is ready for publication as a BCP Yours, Joel M. Halpern On 4/22/16 12:10 PM, Joel M. Halpern wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-sheffer-rfc6982bis-00 > Improving Awareness of Running Code: The Implementation > Status Section > Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern > Review Date: 22-April-2016 > IETF LC End Date: 13-May-2016 > IESG Telechat date: (if known) > > Summary: > > Major issues: > > Minor issues: > The introduction describes RFC1264 as requiring at least one > implementation. The general requirement in RFC 1264 is multiple > implementations, at least two independent. While it is a minor issue, > this document should characterize RFC 1264 more carefully. > > In the Alternative Formats section, it strikes me that there is an > alternative that is sometimes useful that is de-emphasised by the text > as written. If there has been significant insight gained from the > implementations, that may be useful to capture in a longer-lived > context. In that case, an RFC describing implementation may still be > useful. I would appreciate it if the authors would consider adding a > short paragraph to this effect. > > Nits/editorial comments: > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art >
- [Gen-art] A *new* batch of IETF LC reviews - 2016… A. Jean Mahoney
- Re: [Gen-art] review: draft-sheffer-rfc6982bis-00 Adrian Farrel
- [Gen-art] review: draft-sheffer-rfc6982bis-00 Joel M. Halpern
- [Gen-art] review: draft-sheffer-rfc6982bis-00 Joel Halpern
- Re: [Gen-art] review: draft-sheffer-rfc6982bis-00 Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [Gen-art] review: draft-sheffer-rfc6982bis-00 Yaron Sheffer
- Re: [Gen-art] review: draft-sheffer-rfc6982bis-00 Joel M. Halpern
- [Gen-art] review: draft-sheffer-rfc6982bis-01 Joel Halpern
- Re: [Gen-art] review: draft-sheffer-rfc6982bis-01 Jari Arkko