[Gen-art] GEN-ART review of draft-ietf-sipping-rtcp-summary-08
Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com> Sat, 13 February 2010 20:51 UTC
Return-Path: <scott.brim@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB8D828C0FE for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Feb 2010 12:51:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.527
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.527 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.072, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id npannMuRpK4w for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Feb 2010 12:51:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qy0-f191.google.com (mail-qy0-f191.google.com [209.85.221.191]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49C2F28B797 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Feb 2010 12:51:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by qyk29 with SMTP id 29so2045190qyk.13 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Feb 2010 12:52:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=B3N4l4gY8ZRSROKSWUr2CeQsd2JoGX5dj+eaLuOiAWc=; b=Ocegy+MV6gZRgzh+7AB/JJqjFpT4Sjg0PkkvrdrieJRHqgQkS6KFAbA/rrnI6rIvON dnf2KHS7Aw1vMjJsNBvUe0orThQx3/R6HbAFS+JK+Z4/U3aSaUp+LtQFyfGEnwey8wTX 2uB7B8fM+AxuhjptoO7dBG63qeyY72k6r8jqk=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=KtKzfAqOu7woVV0NFPLgjAcbY+ovZ7iHPZ27jHXnenPlJHjde0ifU/qTNisUmzvkxz ZH84LmcBV05xqFbGCfKcnSxCInBi7aR5iBR652snLgtdJ6cNz6U+AkMPu4nqOS9COvIt 2hYuW8CxT7G9TPLZDa0dyFWl/f7OMa2tF65P0=
Received: by 10.224.34.223 with SMTP id m31mr1485996qad.351.1266094378555; Sat, 13 Feb 2010 12:52:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sbrim-mbp.local (198-135-0-233.cisco.com [198.135.0.233]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 6sm2921847qwd.6.2010.02.13.12.52.56 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 13 Feb 2010 12:52:57 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4B771126.4070705@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 15:52:54 -0500
From: Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-sipping-rtcp-summary.all@tools.ietf.org
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Gen-art] GEN-ART review of draft-ietf-sipping-rtcp-summary-08
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 20:51:39 -0000
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-sipping-rtcp-summary-08 Reviewer: Scott Brim Review Date: February 13, 2010 IETF LC End Date: February 16, 2010 Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard Comments: I accumulated some questions as I read the draft, but they were all answered by the time I reached the end. I only have a few editorial comments for you: 3.1 Subscribe/Notify Method > Configuration of an address of the COLLECTOR is not needed as > explained below. Immediately below is the PUBLISH method, but I doubt that "below" is referring to that, and otherwise this reference is not clear. Where specifically is it explained that configuration of an address is not needed? 3.4 Overload Avoidance Some small things: Typo: "MUST send a 503 Service Unavailable or other 5xx esponse" "on these responses and respect the retry after time interval." -- I would make it Retry-After.