[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-repute-model-07
"Roni Even" <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com> Wed, 21 August 2013 13:29 UTC
Return-Path: <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F23011E8396; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 06:29:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iNaQLPa3imcn; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 06:29:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x22d.google.com (mail-wg0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22d]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C32F111E80DE; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 06:29:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f45.google.com with SMTP id n12so408877wgh.24 for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 06:29:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :thread-index:content-language; bh=h7MnCGGYN6vapeaS4e4bugFkN5rC80oWOpaLWkXN998=; b=VNObMlPgE+sV/CST+4Cezae8PkyhcjbzZ8K3uR2WvghQpQDUjtlN0G/F6CMQY3brzC ufxGObtt29GO7EEpl0u++uko2mZKnsGolFzAjwpeQKkSjl4JPJWvoe9476k0olKabByh jCexvvyrg3+iKdTbW5kVpwi3NG/sAKxb7KZrAZo6fjFHPPc7Fm8yrjcbHbis1BYeD+nq sAkSUkwhg2jEyhy+f3uulPVco2ujGgM3ubMA9vdWqUHbJBS5igpTMSt16vCHdQtgywAs o0fvjMQvEhpyDWbrFyyljqqJJpNg/wA/jPRbzsBFssjsEi9wuOQGY4oDKXvu/6jby90D Xtlw==
X-Received: by 10.180.109.10 with SMTP id ho10mr16607757wib.14.1377091772810; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 06:29:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from RoniE ([109.67.221.133]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id dt17sm31148295wic.1.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 21 Aug 2013 06:29:32 -0700 (PDT)
From: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
To: draft-ietf-repute-model.all@tools.ietf.org
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 16:27:03 +0300
Message-ID: <02be01ce9e72$25ac43f0$7104cbd0$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_02BF_01CE9E8B.4AFA1830"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: Ac6ech93EjPEiJ4iR5m11MTCM0qVkg==
Content-Language: en-us
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-repute-model-07
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 13:29:35 -0000
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-repute-model-07 Reviewer: Roni Even Review Date:2013-8-20 IETF LC End Date: 2013-8-29 IESG Telechat date: Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC. Major issues: Minor issues: I was wondering why the "Further Discussion" section 9.3 is part of the security section. I think it should be a separate section. Nits/editorial comments: Section 3 the end of 2nd paragraph "mechansisms" to "mechanisms"