[Gen-art] RE: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-smime-bfibecms-07.txt
"Luther Martin" <martin@voltage.com> Mon, 12 November 2007 19:39 UTC
Return-path: <gen-art-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Irf8S-0000ae-FK; Mon, 12 Nov 2007 14:39:52 -0500
Received: from gen-art by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Irf8R-0000YS-4Q for gen-art-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2007 14:39:51 -0500
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Irf8Q-0000YK-Ps for gen-art@ietf.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2007 14:39:50 -0500
Received: from mail.voltage.com ([209.213.222.98]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Irf8P-0007Bh-Tn for gen-art@ietf.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2007 14:39:50 -0500
Received: from influenza.voltage.com (influenza.voltage.com [172.16.0.77]) by mail.voltage.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id lACJdvlQ020087; Mon, 12 Nov 2007 11:39:58 -0800
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6603.0
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 11:39:48 -0800
Message-ID: <1C01650B36DD3746867EA0B30E3B98190114F326@influenza.voltage.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-smime-bfibecms-07.txt
Thread-Index: AcgXM6kars16i2yaQfyv94cgYCNyDwFj0QIgAiYaPhAAAhmaIA==
References: <941D5DCD8C42014FAF70FB7424686DCF01D6E58C@eusrcmw721.eamcs.ericsson.se> <1C01650B36DD3746867EA0B30E3B98190109A5FB@influenza.voltage.com> <941D5DCD8C42014FAF70FB7424686DCF01F1C281@eusrcmw721.eamcs.ericsson.se>
From: Luther Martin <martin@voltage.com>
To: Eric Gray <eric.gray@ericsson.com>, Mark Schertler <mark.schertler@tumbleweed.com>
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=4.65.5502:2.3.11, 1.2.37, 4.0.164 definitions=2007-11-12_05:2007-11-12, 2007-11-12, 2007-11-12 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=3.1.0-0708230000 definitions=main-0711120087
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 67c1ea29f88502ef6a32ccec927970f0
Cc: Tim Polk <tim.polk@nist.gov>, gen-art@ietf.org
Subject: [Gen-art] RE: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-smime-bfibecms-07.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org
Absolutely. > -----Original Message----- > From: Eric Gray [mailto:eric.gray@ericsson.com] > Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 10:40 AM > To: Luther Martin; Mark Schertler > Cc: Tim Polk; gen-art@ietf.org > Subject: RE: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-smime-bfibecms-07.txt > > Luther, > > I apologize if I should know this, but I do not. Have > you posted a revised draft? > > -- > Eric Gray > Principal Engineer > Ericsson > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Luther Martin [mailto:martin@voltage.com] > > Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2007 4:10 PM > > To: Eric Gray; Mark Schertler > > Cc: Tim Polk; gen-art@ietf.org > > Subject: RE: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-smime-bfibecms-07.txt > > Importance: High > > > > Comments in-line. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Eric Gray [mailto:eric.gray@ericsson.com] > > > Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 11:20 AM > > > To: Luther Martin; Mark Schertler > > > Cc: Tim Polk; gen-art@ietf.org > > > Subject: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-smime-bfibecms-07.txt > > > > > > Authors, > > > > > > I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) > > > reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see > > > http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). > > > > > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last > > Call comments > > > you may receive. > > > > > > > > > > > > Document: > > > > > > "Using the Boneh-Franklin and Boneh-Boyen identity-based > > > encryption algorithms with the Cryptographic Message Syntax" > > > (draft-ietf-smime-bfibecms-07.txt) > > > > > > Reviewer: Eric Gray > > > Review Date: 10/25/2007 > > > IETF LC End Date: 10/25/2007 > > > > > > Summary: > > > ======= > > > > > > This draft is almost ready for publishing as a Proposed Standard. > > > > > > I have some questions and comments below. > > > > > > Comments: > > > ======== > > > > > > Question: In the second bullet, of section 1.2 on page 3, what > > > does the expression "secure distribution" mean? Is the PPS an > > > authenticate-able source, does it only distribute the "publicly > > > sharable cryptographic material" to authenticated recipients or > > > does it use secure connections in the distribution process? > > > > Changed to reflect this comment. > > > > > > > > From the discussion in section 7.1 (second paragraph), it looks > > > as if a PPS is an authenticate-able source. Should this be > > > stated more clearly? > > > > Changed to reflect this comment. > > > > > ________________________________________________________________ > > > > > > [DER] is listed as an informative reference, yet text on page > > > 5 says - > > > > > > "the structure MUST be DER encoded [DER] ..." > > > > > > This should warrant a Normative reference, since it seems it > > > is necessary to have this information in order to implement > > > the step described in this text. > > > > > > A similar argument can be made for each of the following: > > > > > > ASN1 (see reference toward the top of page 3) > > > IBCS (see references at the top of page 8) > > > IBE (see - in particular - process step references - > > > section 4, bullet 1, page 7 > > > section 5, bullets 3 through 5, page 8) > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > > > > > Changed to reflect this comment. > > > > > > > > NITs: > > > ==== > > > > > > There are format problems (premature line-wrap) that should be > > > fixed prior to publication (this probably can be handled as an > > > RFC Editor's note). See, for example, numbered bullets on page > > > 6 (number 2 in the first set, and number 4 in the second). > > > > Changed to reflect this comment. > > > > _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
- [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-smime-b… Eric Gray
- [Gen-art] RE: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-smi… Luther Martin
- [Gen-art] RE: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-smi… Eric Gray
- [Gen-art] RE: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-smi… Luther Martin
- [Gen-art] RE: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-smi… Eric Gray