Re: [Gen-art] [6lo] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6lo-minimal-fragment-08

["Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <[e-mail]>]

Hello Francesca:

Many thanks for your review : )

 
> Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication. However, I noticed the
> normative reference to an informative document, draft-ietf-lwig-6lowpan-
> virtual-reassembly (ref. 'LWIG-VRB'), which is problematic, since this draft is
> on the standard track.

Moved both this and the reference to recoverable frags to informational. They are just illustrative anyway.

> 
> Major issues: -
> 
> Minor issues: -
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> 
> * Last paragraph of Section 5, I suggest a minor reformulation for clarity.
> 
> OLD:
>    An associated
>    caveat is that on a half duplex radio, if node A sends the next
>    fragment at the same time as node B forwards the previous fragment to
>    a node C down the path then node B will miss the next fragment.
> NEW:
>    An associated
>    caveat is that on a half duplex radio, if node A sends the next
>    fragment at the same time as node B forwards the previous fragment to
>    a node C down the path then node B will miss the next fragment from node
> A.
> 

Applied, and published 09. Please let me know if we are all set now? 


Again, many thanks, Francesca!

Pascal