Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-carpenter-renum-needs-work-04

"Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@alcatel-lucent.com> Mon, 30 November 2009 18:16 UTC

Return-Path: <vkg@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B969B28C139 for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:16:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aCxj5tr71Kzs for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:16:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ihemail3.lucent.com (ihemail3.lucent.com [135.245.0.37]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D42BF28C12B for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:16:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from umail.lucent.com (h135-3-40-63.lucent.com [135.3.40.63]) by ihemail3.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id nAUIG6ls009427 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:16:06 -0600 (CST)
Received: from [135.185.236.17] (il0015vkg1.ih.lucent.com [135.185.236.17]) by umail.lucent.com (8.13.8/TPES) with ESMTP id nAUIG6ak015571; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:16:06 -0600 (CST)
Message-ID: <4B140BE6.6080907@alcatel-lucent.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:16:06 -0600
From: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@alcatel-lucent.com>
Organization: Bell Labs Security Technology Research Group
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ran Atkinson <ran.atkinson@gmail.com>
References: <4B0B1903.1050901@lucent.com> <4B118B4A.3090109@gmail.com> <4B14063B.1090103@alcatel-lucent.com> <F00589AC-6C13-4008-A793-6D78A0879B8B@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <F00589AC-6C13-4008-A793-6D78A0879B8B@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.37
Cc: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>, gen-art@ietf.org, Hannu Flinck <hannu.flinck@nsn.com>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-carpenter-renum-needs-work-04
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:16:18 -0000

Ran Atkinson wrote:
> On 30  Nov 2009, at 12:51 , Vijay K. Gurbani wrote:
>> ...it is not the
>> case that Java is exposing some additional functionality that
>> C/C++ do not. 
> 
> Indeed.  That is precisely our point, although phrased in an
> inverse manner.

I think we are in agreement.  The main issue I wanted to
make sure got across is exactly what I wrote previously:

   ...it is not the case that Java is exposing some additional
   functionality that C/C++ do not.  Java is just packaging
   the functionality in an attractive, easy to use manner.

Any attempts to word-smith this in a manner that does not
give undue advantage to a particular language should be good.

In a certain sense, Java is a language as well as a platform.
Thus, many ideas can be abstracted a bit better that one could
do so in C++.  To take an equivalent example, one could just
as well include these IPv4/IPv6 APIs in the C++ boost library
and attain the same level of abstraction as Java does.

Thanks,

- vijay
-- 
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60566 (USA)
Email: vkg@{alcatel-lucent.com,bell-labs.com,acm.org}
Web:   http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/