Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-sipcore-invfix-01

Enrico - thanks for your review.

As one of the document editors, I have a comment and question inline:

On Jun 21, 2010, at 8:48 AM, Enrico Marocco wrote:

> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
> you may receive.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-sipcore-invfix-01
> Reviewer: Enrico Marocco
> Review Date: 2010-06-21
> IETF LC End Date: 2010-06-22
> 
> Summary: Ready with very minor nits.
> 
> 
> Major issues: none.
> 
> 
> Minor issues: none.
> 
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> 
> "User Agent" is defined in S. 3., second paragraph with the
> parenthesized expansion following the acronym. This is not consistent
> with the previous definition of "SIP," in S. 2. Since the term "user
> agent" already appears a few lines above, I'd suggest to define the
> acronym there, in the usual form.

I agree that the acronym expansion is better done somewhere else in this case,
mostly because the string "UA core" needs to be searchable in this document.

> 
> Same as above for "Transaction User" in S. 7.1., second paragraph.
This one I don't understand. What's the inconsistency you're seeing here?

> 
> 
> Note: As already pointed out by IANA, the "IANA Considerations" section
> should update the "Method and Response Codes" registry in the parts
> concerning the INVITE method.

yes.

> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art