Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt-06

Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> Mon, 08 February 2016 11:16 UTC

Return-Path: <ggx@gigix.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E75DA1ACF6C for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 03:16:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MySPM2HMeOkI for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 03:16:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22a.google.com (mail-wm0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 740E41ACEE4 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 03:16:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id p63so110692491wmp.1 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 03:16:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gigix-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=p1F+jEfqWuYA/oANWvxY+1xzwkB0lkM2i+afUNKRv/A=; b=nEBqcdlAtEbus3v/LNBffWXDXwd2cUvBSSJtZzzgM4GAvtoc+kQ2ff/fG9cj4X5KQd eOOKUpd8L6vjJUVbhtOTihrjkOdHcw1j+oS9mxptEGHkJUyIavl/tmlWIgLlD2Rz8lnL r4qPVnKEUJ7QpQvFYfWULiZQ6/U0xo4Vo3S6wkfKjpEXo2vcTFxzBVFTZR0H5zWgsVAM 8mJ4FiY9PBzYBIzLNVfXqHcBwJezgsbTj7bu9Q+mbrwr3x5/c0TTgPRBR6A3/t3/vD8X 8cvi8mvjZwRRZl72UZhY9EQUc0orxdpBM2jJZ3qhEMuchPhMNCWywkKpUeYAkpeNKDuj ATRA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to; bh=p1F+jEfqWuYA/oANWvxY+1xzwkB0lkM2i+afUNKRv/A=; b=nAWBk+JYnsopIBfh57aUVxa5Kpjz5FxHfrmr2rn0Yc6msn6qSeeCx7skwImR3fNn0H Y2y6PBEuNaChNJaABueY5AxvaQGOguGXv5P8ONDqgubJQY5DJVCFHtPjuWcj1WvV4Zo5 ABuwW3ZMD4xrcmvSHpAeG+XzGkzX2w9SgwFhifRM5qQO8msQJQ9RHScRrxBXUINbP6PG cu30iv74SL3ElZ5psQzUTXPRif7UUBMoTMuskkM9/4ImehYYhK88tuaxEFx7/b7ke0E5 NlNouad9AnX7AYGvbNc8S+c7jybJoz1bAAgJZQjNd36wKxhgPf2qm8OFZhYB01Ronw7w PHug==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOSbYw8DJ0/bRTlY87UZx+gCAZxpE+lIF7xdwy+VC9nCFUW2nY+gx/Ao20+t4bm87g==
X-Received: by 10.194.9.42 with SMTP id w10mr26666410wja.159.1454930204025; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 03:16:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:660:330f:38:a823:a32a:7502:c5fe? ([2001:660:330f:38:a823:a32a:7502:c5fe]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s2sm28352596wjs.39.2016.02.08.03.16.41 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 08 Feb 2016 03:16:42 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\))
From: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
In-Reply-To: <004001d1608f$ef60e6b0$ce22b410$@akayla.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 12:17:11 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <30DBBD82-6F32-4D05-B1D6-0E2564855ED7@gigix.net>
References: <004001d1608f$ef60e6b0$ce22b410$@akayla.com>
To: Peter Yee <peter@akayla.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/eXT5ktg8aKkGvn6xNL0o1ALmLqM>
Cc: draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt.all@tools.ietf.org, gen-art@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt-06
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 11:16:51 -0000

Hi Peter,

Back in April we indeed did not sent you a specific feedback. 
Reason is that we received several comments/reviews and batched everything in a new I-D, with sending specific feedback to all.

Yet, if you are unsatisfied on how we addressed the issues we certainly need to do more work.

Give me some time to go again thoroughly through your first review and I’ll get back to you with a specific feedback.

Thanks for your time spent on this document.

ciao

L.



> On 06 Feb 2016, at 04:39, Peter Yee <peter@akayla.com> wrote:
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft.  The General Area Review
> Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for
> the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just like any other last call
> comment.  For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt-06
> Reviewer: Peter Yee
> Review Date: February 5, 2016
> IETF LC End Date: February 5, 2016
> IESG Telechat date: February 18, 2016
> 
> Summary: This draft has serious issues, described in the review, and needs
> to be rethought. [Not ready]
> 
> The draft attempts to specify the framework for the management of
> experimental LISP EID sub-prefixes, but really could use some additional
> work to flesh out the management aspects that are left unsaid.
> 
> This draft fixes only two minor nits I raised in my review of the -04
> version.  Nothing else has been addressed, nor have I received any feedback
> on that review.  In light of this, I have little new to add.  It is possible
> that the agreement between the IANA and the RIPE NCC will alleviate the
> major concern I had with the draft, but not being privy to that agreement, I
> can't make that determination.
> 
> My original review with the unaddressed comments can be found here:
> https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/current/msg11620.html
> 
> 
>