IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-pcp-authentication-11.txt

Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> Thu, 09 July 2015 13:50 UTC

Return-Path: <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BED81A909C for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 06:50:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.235
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.235 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f9jDEeMNm7Xc for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 06:50:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resqmta-po-07v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-po-07v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe16:19:96:114:154:166]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 832A71A909B for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 06:50:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resomta-po-04v.sys.comcast.net ([96.114.154.228]) by resqmta-po-07v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id qDpc1q0014vw8ds01DqkMK; Thu, 09 Jul 2015 13:50:44 +0000
Received: from Paul-Kyzivats-MacBook-Pro.local ([50.138.229.151]) by resomta-po-04v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id qDqi1q0013Ge9ey01DqiJn; Thu, 09 Jul 2015 13:50:43 +0000
Message-ID: <559E7C31.30306@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 09:50:41 -0400
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>, "Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)" <tireddy@cisco.com>
References: <913383AAA69FF945B8F946018B75898A47882F34@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com> <DD094F26-1676-4388-B38F-7051C8112347@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <DD094F26-1676-4388-B38F-7051C8112347@piuha.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1436449844; bh=VBzfygA9MjKwMu+jwbb4i2jCe/S14GguHZkfSi9TWD0=; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject: Content-Type; b=FTTaF3uzOgrbmDvVSYSXZEy/HXvfzQnf9lqxstoUh6g4DttJwn+45h9tFgrGAVe1z B78TW3yPlH6TUCOEQTogXp06NkyCbj+H02Wo0UK0Jx/D0RRgq/xHNCOP5rAwpRHzyL pxyoBYPWfspmwXNxBOPCW9FiJzcfwiiUYc16jSa50cmDUBLjxj5qMSztcSQG4UrL9L B4wMM1cY/eLeUWEIJ9q0gjnYuYwyiE0Q8p17a4jbU3L11RpegWrZnp36syZHB1klIg kuT5KT2Vy4IZo7kBArBVcPrTMSQRZIn0vrfVVLbPxzltoljristkLHd3dGZP3HtzP7 +NYiHkzVrm/Uw==
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/elOLySnuRSHJqetE-q7DtT66cyQ>
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-pcp-authentication.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pcp-authentication.all@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-pcp-authentication-11.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 13:50:45 -0000

On 7/8/15 6:14 PM, Jari Arkko wrote:
> Paul: Thanks for this excellent and detailed review (and one that was truly from a generalist point of view).
>
> And Tiru, thank you for taking the comments into account.
>
> Paul, what is your opinion, has the newest draft sufficiently addressed your original comments?

At this point it is hard to say. Certainly the changes made in the most 
recent version I reviewed made progress. There have been many 
discussions and proposals since. I'll need to see another version to 
know how it all goes together.

The changes have been rather significant, so I expect that the WG will 
want to discuss them.

	Thanks,
	Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email