[Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-tls-grease-03.txt

Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr> Wed, 14 August 2019 08:09 UTC

Return-Path: <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73A2C12009C; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 01:09:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qaCZwDiPg5k2; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 01:09:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from givry.fdupont.fr (givry.fdupont.fr [IPv6:2001:41d0:1:6d55:211:5bff:fe98:d51e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F2E3120077; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 01:09:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from givry.fdupont.fr (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by givry.fdupont.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id x7E7LnLS028016; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 09:21:49 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from dupont@givry.fdupont.fr)
Message-Id: <201908140721.x7E7LnLS028016@givry.fdupont.fr>
From: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-tls-grease.all@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 09:21:49 +0200
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/fPQp8QPiEvXptB2lzcZeTwDgU2E>
Subject: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-tls-grease-03.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 08:09:49 -0000

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-tls-grease-03.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20190803
IETF LC End Date: 20190812
IESG Telechat date: 20190822

Summary: Ready

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None

Nits/editorial comments:
 - ToC page 2 and 8 page 11: Acknowledgements -> Acknowledgments

 - 5 page 7: I have a concern about your use of the term random. In fact
  even it is a security document here random is just plain English
  (vs any crypto meaning). Constraints seems to be:
   * coverage: the set of used values should not be small
   * privacy: fingerprinting should not be easy
  I do not propose any solution: just follow recommendations of
  the security directorate in the case this point is a problem.

Regards

Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr