[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-klensin-idna-rfc5891bis-04

Vijay Gurbani via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 13 August 2019 14:02 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietf.org
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FDE5120822; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 07:02:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Vijay Gurbani via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-klensin-idna-rfc5891bis.all@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.100.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Vijay Gurbani <vijay.gurbani@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <156570496017.24103.10968169166797701286@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 07:02:40 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/n1c7peE4i0lpM2cYFD-fdpANdRk>
Subject: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-klensin-idna-rfc5891bis-04
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 14:02:48 -0000

Reviewer: Vijay Gurbani
Review result: Ready with Nits

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-klensin-idna-rfc5891bis-??
Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani
Review Date: 2019-08-13
IETF LC End Date: 2019-08-30
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary: This document is ready for publication as proposed standard, but has a
couple of nits as detailed below.

Major issues: 0

Minor issues: 0

Nits/editorial comments: 2

- Section 2, last paragraph: "By necessity, the latter ...", here, "latter"
probably
 refers to "protocol restrictions".  However, I am not sure whether the rest of
 the sentence ("...the latter are somewhat generic, having to ...") refers to
 protocol restrictions or registry restrictions.  It seems to me that the rest
 of the sentence is referring to registry restrictions, in which case,
 s/latter/former/.

- Section 8: s/Faltstrom/Falstrom/

Thank you.