Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-mext-aaa-ha-goals-01.txt
"Julien Bournelle" <julien.bournelle@gmail.com> Fri, 18 July 2008 14:14 UTC
Return-Path: <gen-art-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: gen-art-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-gen-art-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 200393A69F5; Fri, 18 Jul 2008 07:14:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDA3C3A6985 for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Jul 2008 05:43:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VubqenrcbaQz for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Jul 2008 05:43:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com (yw-out-2324.google.com [74.125.46.29]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B489C3A68E4 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Jul 2008 05:43:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 3so93193ywj.49 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Jul 2008 05:43:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=1dBa7ZP8XK1rbuxwEz5/Gel/nqfmga50rT2aLWWeNnk=; b=WzsHTcRp1OrKerPLP8wkcc+44gDjXuPZmQ5oT8cFa2PVGdLfxy40maDDFwFVavalID P6WOizG0SZ5y0a9MTwhF/qMaCFETsZ/zN6iQ7CykHtyV+4bUbjf9uwDgqykDUehGs297 S0QwUX2f/HvlJTP3JYdsKLcDuhdumk+pQYSQk=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=aPzrvCSMIv8bmut9rc17/MNAbHqWxn1+GCUKx0vn3kwLj238ln2e1ZmBSCnntWYPEZ FDHSZkC1v7J7aizpp6Cc5Bt1xZKQoDG1rI9qCPWfDPePHGFK5uQNOlW1wW4LaPTsnm/q fEnkT4uEO98np6hb7pCkOIwELTr4MpD9FuYpQ=
Received: by 10.100.31.3 with SMTP id e3mr49413ane.64.1216385014350; Fri, 18 Jul 2008 05:43:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.100.211.17 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Jul 2008 05:43:34 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5e2406980807180543rbbcbf78wd1085dd2f2d0a2d9@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 14:43:34 +0200
From: Julien Bournelle <julien.bournelle@gmail.com>
To: Eric Gray <eric.gray@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <941D5DCD8C42014FAF70FB7424686DCF035546AA@eusrcmw721.eamcs.ericsson.se>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <941D5DCD8C42014FAF70FB7424686DCF035546AA@eusrcmw721.eamcs.ericsson.se>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 07:14:44 -0700
Cc: Elena Demaria <elena.demaria@telecomitalia.it>, gen-art@ietf.org, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>, "Ivana.Guardini" <ivano.guardini@telecomitalia.it>, Gerardo Giaretta <gerardo@qualcomm.com>, Rafa Marin Lopez <rafa@dif.um.es>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-mext-aaa-ha-goals-01.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org
Hi Eric, all, Thank your very much for handling this review and for your comments ! We'd also like to apologize for the long delay. After some internal discussions, we reach a consensus. Basically, this document aims to provide guidance to solution documents for the Mobile IPv6 bootstrapping problem. It is thus a companion document to the following document: For RADIUS based solution: draft-ietf-mip6-radius For Diameter based solution: draft-ietf-dime-mip6-split draft-ietf-dime-mip6-integrated Hence, the goal was to catch what were the needed features that people wanted to see in AAA applications. Having said that, I agree that it would have been better to say: "A solution MUST define how an NAS will' instead of "NAS MUST" but as you said the document would be really more difficult to read. Concerning the "SHOULD", we agree with you that we need to revisit our requirement to clarify what we mean by this "SHOULD" in a requirement documents. As a requirement document, we can not say if a feature as to be a MUST or a SHOULD. We just require (or not) some features. Based on this remark, we propose the following modifications: 1/ CHANGE: G4.4 The HA SHOULD be able to request the AAAH server to authenticate the MN with the value in the MN-AAA Mobility Message Authentication Option. TO: G4.4 The HA supporting the Authentication Protocol MUST be able to request the AAAH server to authenticate the MN with the value in the MN-AAA Mobility Message Authentication Option. 2/ CHANGE: G6.3 The ASP/MSP SHOULD be able to indicate to the MSA if it can allocate a Home Agent to the MN. Therefore the NAS SHOULD be able to include suggested HA address in the ASP in the NAS - AAA interaction. TO: G6.3 The ASP/MSP supporting the allocation of a Home Agent MUST be able to indicate to the MSA if it can allocate a Home Agent to the MN. Therefore the NAS MUST be able to include suggested HA address in the ASP in the NAS - AAA interaction. 3/ We do not want to change the following requirement (in section 5.5): The HA SHOULD be able to communicate to the AAAH server the Home Address allocated to the MN and the FQDN of the MN (e.g., for allowing the AAAH server to perform a DNS update on behalf of the MN). Because it is not clear if it would be a problem if a solution document does not support it. Thus a SHOULD seems ok. 4/ Concerning the second requirement in section 5.5: The AAAH SHOULD be able to indicate to the HA if the MN is authorized to autoconfigure its Home Address. We think it is ok to let it but we want to add the following sentence: If the AAAH does not indicate to the HA if a MN is authorized to autoconfigure its address, the MN is not authorized. If you agree with these modifications and if they address your comments, we will produce a -02 version. Thanks again, Best regards, Julien Bournelle _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
- [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-… Eric Gray
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-i… Julien Bournelle
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-i… Jari Arkko
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-i… Eric Gray
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-i… Eric Gray
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-i… Julien Bournelle
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-i… Eric Gray
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-i… Jari Arkko