Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-mcgrew-tls-aes-ccm-ecc-07

[Meral Shirazipour <[e-mail]>]

Hi Robert,

  Yes I saw that and replied to this older one by mistake.  Thank you for the re-correction.



Best,

Meral



From: Robert Cragie [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2013 2:41 PM
To: Meral Shirazipour
Cc: David McGrew; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Subject: Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-mcgrew-tls-aes-ccm-ecc-07



I did send an e-mail - there is a mistake below.

The suggested reference should be:

[SEP2] ZigBee Alliance, Inc. and HomePlug Powerline Alliance, Inc., "Smart Energy Profile 2 Application Protocol Standard", ZigBee Public Document 13-0200-00, 2013.

Please make sure this is used, not the one below.

Thank you

Robert

On 13/10/2013 05:28, Meral Shirazipour wrote:

   Hi,

     Thank you, that will be great.



   Best,

   Meral



   From: Robert Cragie [mailto:[e-mail]]
   Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 2:02 PM
   To: Meral Shirazipour
   Cc: David McGrew; [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>; [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
   Subject: Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-mcgrew-tls-aes-ccm-ecc-07



   The suggested reference is:

   [SEP2] ZigBee Alliance, Inc. and HomePlug Powerline Alliance, Inc., "Smart Energy Profile 2 9 Application Protocol Standard", ZigBee Public Document 13-0200-00, 2013.

   Then perhaps reword:

   "This draft is motivated by the considerations raised in the Zigbee Smart Energy 2.0 working group"

   to something like:

   "This draft is motivated by the considerations raised in the Zigbee Smart Energy 2.0 working group and specified in [SEP2]"

   Robert

   On 10/10/2013 16:32, Meral Shirazipour wrote:

      Hi,

        Thank you David.



      Best Regards,

      Meral



      From: David McGrew [mailto:[e-mail]]
      Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 6:10 AM
      To: Meral Shirazipour
      Cc: [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>; [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>; [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
      Subject: Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-mcgrew-tls-aes-ccm-ecc-07



      Hi Meral,

      many thanks for the review, more inline:

      On 10/10/2013 03:26 AM, Meral Shirazipour wrote:

         I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq  .



         Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive.



         Document: draft-mcgrew-tls-aes-ccm-ecc-07

         Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour

         Review Date: 2013-10-10

         IETF LC End Date: 2013-10-10

         IESG Telechat date: NA





         Summary:

         This draft is ready to be published as Informational RFC but I do have some editorial comments.



         Nits/editorial comments:

         -[Page 4], is there a reason to use both "seq_num field" and "sequence_number field" ?


      looking at RFC 6655 suggests that the latter should be changed to match the former.






      -[Page 7], Section 7, Zigbee Smart Energy 2.0 working group, a reference would be useful since it is not an IETF WG.


      That is a good idea.   I've copied Robert Cragie, who should be able to suggest a good reference.

      David










      Best Regards,

      Meral



      ---

      Meral Shirazipour

      Ericsson

      Research

      www.ericsson.com<http://www.ericsson.com>