Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-options-registry-01.txt

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Wed, 11 May 2011 20:55 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71A28E0885 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 May 2011 13:55:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OrODVBYa3VUv for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 May 2011 13:55:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pz0-f44.google.com (mail-pz0-f44.google.com [209.85.210.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE121E0674 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 May 2011 13:55:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pzk5 with SMTP id 5so553759pzk.31 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 May 2011 13:55:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent :mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=uOfYZZFLep7xBerbnNhEY2l/3xdkUHJSOR3kG2UagRM=; b=A7OUYrZ6qk+1GbSgD5AH3kU5rFuJuWa/zVSwbM2dCfFc/OH/85lTPlNUo9ZGKoveS5 VbCRyyZ0KR9LKDQSXOkvO8h/bQebyA4/zrsnTQ25JJsMAXbnQEvUr8aF9u3+mwVmCFfm 8mmnPn0sUZDuLA73rAcDw1efPP+59e++oClIE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=mQT6jjl+PZwS2PJv9RUVoLWEkyBKR2w0SMkn+10JVtDnUfRdmeEePEzltEq9dsKd20 Gi6NczN6WNSBZzHwtu3YvxA6PB0buhisx+N9vWOqI62j5Ds5/W3RrNc0cJV0YRW9C9iZ qKYoFVgd7jmzIChsNcxWLMm8bx3+Gz+iWZO0A=
Received: by 10.68.16.229 with SMTP id j5mr2673990pbd.280.1305147305748; Wed, 11 May 2011 13:55:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [130.216.38.124] (stf-brian.sfac.auckland.ac.nz [130.216.38.124]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k7sm198658pbe.32.2011.05.11.13.55.03 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 11 May 2011 13:55:04 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4DCAF796.8070006@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 08:54:46 +1200
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
References: <4DC9C630.8010807@gmail.com> <4DCA2CB5.90407@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <4DCA2CB5.90407@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-options-registry.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-options-registry.all@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-options-registry-01.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 20:55:06 -0000

On 2011-05-11 18:29, Magnus Westerlund wrote:
> On 2011-05-11 01:11, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>> Document: draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-options-registry-01.txt
>> Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
>> Review Date: 2011-05-11
>> IETF LC End Date: 2011-05-12
>> IESG Telechat date: 
>>
>> Summary: Almost ready
>> --------
>>
>> Minor issue:
>> ------------
>>
>> The Introduction says:
>>
>>   "As there has come into
>>    existence at least one ICE option, there is need to create the
>>    registry."
> 
> Yes, I have received this comment and make it clear that it is
> draft-ietf-avtcore-ecn-for-rtp that is the reason for this work.
> 
>> Maybe a reference for that option would be useful. In fact, I wonder
>> if this draft shouldn't just define that option as the initial
>> content of the new registry?
>>
> 
> No, I don't think so. The ICE option is just an identifier for a
> particular mechanism that is defined in draft-ietf-avtcore-ecn-for-rtp
> and as that draft is just about ready for WG last call I think we can
> instate the registry first and then let the registration happen at the
> time that work is approved.

That's fine by me.

    Brian