Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-signal-09

Thanks for your review, Meral! I see that the -10 has taken your suggestions into account.

Jari

On Apr 4, 2013, at 5:54 AM, Meral Shirazipour <meral.shirazipour@ericsson.com> wrote:

> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq .
>  
> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive.
>  
> Document: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-signal-09
> Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour
> Review Date: 2013-04-03
> IETF LC End Date: 2013-04-03
> IESG Telechat date: N/A
>  
> Summary:
> This draft is almost ready to be published as Standard RFC but I do have some editorial comments.
>  
> Nits/editorial comments:
> - Reading the abstract does not tell why these options are necessary. The 4th paragraph in Intro mentions the purpose of these options as well as Section 8.
> Please consider adding a similar sentence as Section 8 to the abstract:
> "The proposed extensions allow the signaling of new algorithm uptake in client code to allow zone administrators to know when it is possible to complete an algorithm rollover in a DNSSEC signed zone."
>  
> -[Page 4], last sentence: "in a potential future example". Suggestion: "in potential future examples".
>  
> -[Page 7], Section 9, [I-D.ietf-dnsext-rfc2671bis-edns0], latest version is 10.
>  
> Best Regards,
> Meral
>  
> ---
> Meral Shirazipour
> Ericsson
> Research
> www.ericsson.com
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art