[Gen-art] Re: Gen-ART review of draft-huston-ipv6-iana-specials-01.txt
Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net> Thu, 08 June 2006 00:57 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fo8pz-0003zY-NN; Wed, 07 Jun 2006 20:57:27 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fo8Pf-000161-9U for gen-art@ietf.org; Wed, 07 Jun 2006 20:30:15 -0400
Received: from kahuna.telstra.net ([2001:360::4]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fo8Pd-0002Kz-Jm for gen-art@ietf.org; Wed, 07 Jun 2006 20:30:15 -0400
Received: from gihm3.apnic.net (protege.telstra.net [203.50.0.194] (may be forged)) by kahuna.telstra.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k580U917050110; Thu, 8 Jun 2006 10:30:09 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from gih@apnic.net)
Message-Id: <6.2.0.14.2.20060608092605.02d4d308@kahuna.telstra.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.0.14
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 09:27:10 +1000
To: Tom-PT Taylor <taylor@nortel.com>, gen-art@ietf.org
From: Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net>
In-Reply-To: <44871E8D.3040806@nortel.com>
References: <44871E8D.3040806@nortel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--)
X-Scan-Signature: 9466e0365fc95844abaf7c3f15a05c7d
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 07 Jun 2006 20:57:25 -0400
Cc:
Subject: [Gen-art] Re: Gen-ART review of draft-huston-ipv6-iana-specials-01.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org
At 04:44 AM 8/06/2006, Tom-PT Taylor wrote: >I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for draft-huston-ipv6-iana-specials-01.txt. > >For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at >http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html. >Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you >may receive. > >This draft is ready for publication as a Standards Track document, except >that it lacks RFC 2119 language and capitalization. I am not sure whether >IESG practice requires RFC 2119 to be applied in a document such as this. > >I have one editing suggestion. Section 2 makes a sudden transition from >background to intent of the present document. I had to read a second time >to realize that "This document" after the last quotation block refers to >draft-huston-ipv6-iana-specials-01.txt, not the document just cited. >Perhaps you might want to make that "The present document" instead. the latter is probably best handled by the RFC editor. I'll take advice on SHOULD vs should, etc as I'm unsure myself in this context thanks indeed for spending the time undertaking this review Geoff _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
- [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-huston-ipv6-ian… Tom-PT Taylor
- [Gen-art] Re: Gen-ART review of draft-huston-ipv6… Geoff Huston