Re: [Gen-art] Assignment: draft-snell-atompub-feed-thread-12.txt

Fair enough.  Thanks for answering the question.
Joel

At 12:15 AM 6/16/2006, James M Snell wrote:
>The atomURI label is adopted from RFC4287, which also uses the labels to
>accept IRI's.  Yes, it is confusing, but given that this is an extension
>to RFC4287, I felt it was better to reuse the concepts than to redefine
>them.
>
>- James
>
>Joel M. Halpern wrote:
> > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for draft-snell-atompub-feed-thread.txt.
> > For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
> > <http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html>.
> >
> > Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
> > or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
> >
> > This document appears ready for publication as a Proposed Standard.
> > However, I have a question...
> > Several of the attributes have a type of "atomURI".  However, reading
> > the text carefully, it is clear that they are actually IRIs.  I suspect
> > that those have the same syntax.  But since they have different
> > semantics, it seems odd for the syntax definition to refer to atomURI
> > rather than atomIRI.
> >
> > Thank you for addressing my earlier comments.
> >
> > Yours,
> > Joel M. Halpern
> >
> > ------
> > GEN Atom Threading Extensions (Proposed Standard)
> >
> > 
> <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-snell-atompub-feed-thread-12.txt>draft-snell-atompub-feed-thread-12.txt
> >
> > Token: <mailto:lisa@osafoundation.org>Lisa Dusseault
> > Reviewer:Joel Halpern (reviewed -10 for LC)
> >
> >

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art