[Gen-art] Re: Genart review of draft-ietf-radext-dynauth-server-mib-05 / draft-ietf-radext-dynauth-client-mib-05

Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> Thu, 08 June 2006 16:35 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FoNTm-0008Lq-Nf; Thu, 08 Jun 2006 12:35:30 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FoNTk-0008LZ-V7 for gen-art@ietf.org; Thu, 08 Jun 2006 12:35:28 -0400
Received: from stsc1260-eth-s1-s1p1-vip.va.neustar.com ([156.154.16.129] helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FoMxa-0006Hr-8l for gen-art@ietf.org; Thu, 08 Jun 2006 12:02:14 -0400
Received: from borg.juniper.net ([207.17.137.119]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FoMTy-0001vB-78 for gen-art@ietf.org; Thu, 08 Jun 2006 11:31:39 -0400
Received: from unknown (HELO proton.jnpr.net) ([10.10.2.37]) by borg.juniper.net with ESMTP; 08 Jun 2006 08:31:38 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: i="4.05,218,1146466800"; d="scan'208"; a="557463717:sNHT30024604"
Received: from [172.23.1.129] ([172.23.1.129] RDNS failed) by proton.jnpr.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 8 Jun 2006 11:31:36 -0400
Message-ID: <448842D4.1010803@juniper.net>
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 11:31:32 -0400
From: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: stefaan.de_cnodder@alcatel.be
References: <448725D6.30902@juniper.net> <4487F924.4040505@alcatel.be>
In-Reply-To: <4487F924.4040505@alcatel.be>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Jun 2006 15:31:36.0361 (UTC) FILETIME=[A1019190:01C68B10]
X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--)
X-Scan-Signature: 41c17b4b16d1eedaa8395c26e9a251c4
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, radiusext@ops.ietf.org
Subject: [Gen-art] Re: Genart review of draft-ietf-radext-dynauth-server-mib-05 / draft-ietf-radext-dynauth-client-mib-05
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org

Ok. In that case, you are fine. The MIB Rx is the MIB Doctor Review
group. Your AD will introduce you to them somewhere in the process.

                     Ron


stefaan.de_cnodder@alcatel.be wrote:
> 
> Hi Ron,
> 
> Thanks for the review, see below for some answers
> 
> Ron Bonica wrote:
> 
>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for:
>> draft-ietf-radext-dynauth-server-mib-05
>>           -and-
>> draft-ietf-radext-dynauth-client-mib-05
>>
>>
>> For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
>> http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html.
>> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
>> you may receive.
>>
>> This draft is ready for publication as a Standards Track document,
>> except for the following nit:
>>
> 
> In fact, the 2 documents are informational.
> 
>> - The client MIB contains a note to the RFC editor about the reference
>> [DYNSERV]. However, there is no such reference.
>>
> 
> I checked it and the client MIB is Ok, in the server MIB it seems that
> the RFC ed note is incorrect and [DYNSERV] should be replaced by
> [DYNCLNT]. The references in both of the drafts are correct, with the
> exception of the RFC ed note in the server MIB.
> 
> 
>> And two substantial questions:
>>
>> - Can I assume that it has passed MIB Rx Review? (It compiles clean).
>>
> 
> Not sure what MIB Rx review is. I compliled the MIB with Smilent.
> 
>> - Should this MIB *ever* be used in conjuntion with SNMPv1? I know that
>> you *recommend* against it. But it seems that divulging the information
>> in this mib to a hostile party might be pretty bad.
>>
> 
> http://www.ops.ietf.org/mib-security.html contains preformatted text for
> the security section and that text was put in the draft. See the text on
> that webpage in the section "-- else if there are no read-write objects
> in your MIB module". The text in the draft is more or less a copy/paste
> from that webpage. Also the other Radius MIBs like
> draft-ietf-radext-rfc2618bis-03.txt are also following the guidelines on
> the mentioned webpage.
> 
> regards,
> Stefaan
> 
> 
>>                                       Ron
>>
>>
> 

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art