[Gen-art] Hello Russ ? [RE: Russ Housley's Discuss on draft-ietf-pim-port [Was: Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-pim-port-09.txt]]
"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Sat, 07 January 2012 20:59 UTC
Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C14DE21F84FF; Sat, 7 Jan 2012 12:59:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tp0E35dzxCou; Sat, 7 Jan 2012 12:59:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (asmtp3.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.159]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA75A21F84DA; Sat, 7 Jan 2012 12:59:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q07Kx0oB003947; Sat, 7 Jan 2012 20:59:00 GMT
Received: from 950129200 (adsl-89-217-79-52.adslplus.ch [89.217.79.52]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q07Kwsj8003918 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 7 Jan 2012 20:58:57 GMT
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'Stig Venaas' <svenaas@cisco.com>, housley@vigilsec.com
Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2012 20:58:55 -0000
Message-ID: <00fa01cccd7f$2e9af670$8bd0e350$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AczNfwoNDfPXUFLMQLutSIE3Hj4WPg==
Content-Language: en-gb
Cc: iesg@ietf.org, 'General Area Review Team' <gen-art@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-pim-port.all@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [Gen-art] Hello Russ ? [RE: Russ Housley's Discuss on draft-ietf-pim-port [Was: Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-pim-port-09.txt]]
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2012 20:59:05 -0000
Russ, Pingy pingy ping. I've added to the informal agenda for 1/12/12 A > -----Original Message----- > From: Adrian Farrel [mailto:adrian@olddog.co.uk] > Sent: 03 January 2012 22:08 > To: 'Stig Venaas'; 'Russ Housley' > Cc: 'Suresh Krishnan'; 'draft-ietf-pim-port.all@tools.ietf.org'; 'General Area > Review Team' > Subject: RE: Russ Housley's Discuss on draft-ietf-pim-port [Was: Gen-ART > Telechat review of draft-ietf-pim-port-09.txt] > > In the hope that the change (acceptable to Suresh) will work for Russ, I have > entered the RFC Editor note. > > A > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Stig Venaas [mailto:svenaas@cisco.com] > > Sent: 03 January 2012 17:27 > > To: Russ Housley > > Cc: Suresh Krishnan; adrian@olddog.co.uk; draft-ietf-pim- > port.all@tools.ietf.org; > > General Area Review Team > > Subject: Re: Russ's Discs on draft-ietf-pim-port [Was: Gen-ART Telechat review > of > > draft-ietf-pim-port-09.txt] > > > > Russ, I've sent 3-4 emails in December asking if your discuss can be > > resolved, but no response. I hope you can respond now. > > > > Stig > > > > On 11/28/2011 11:07 AM, Stig Venaas (svenaas) wrote: > > > On 11/29/2011 10:18 AM, Suresh Krishnan wrote: > > > > Hi Stig, > > > > > > > > > > > > On 11/28/2011 12:59 PM, Stig Venaas wrote: > > > >>> Please note that the Connection ID AFI in the PORT Hello Option > > > does not > > > >>> need to match the address family of PIM Hello message that carries it. > > > >>> e.g. an IPv6 PIM Hello message could contain a PORT Hello Option with a > > > >>> TCP Connection ID AFI of 1 (IPv4). > > > >> > > > >> While I am OK with this text, wouldn't it be better to add this to 3.1 > > > >> and 3.2 where we formally define the hello options? > > > >> > > > >> My proposal would be: > > > >> > > > >> End of 3.1: > > > >> > > > >> OLD: > > > >> TCP Connection ID AFI: The AFI value to describe the address-family > > > >> of the address of the TCP Connection ID field. When this field is > > > >> 0, a mechanism outside the scope of this document is used to > > > >> obtain the addresses used to establish the TCP connection. > > > >> > > > >> NEW: > > > >> TCP Connection ID AFI: The AFI value to describe the address-family > > > >> of the address of the TCP Connection ID field. Note that this > > > >> value does not need to match the address-family of the PIM Hello > > > >> message that carries it. When this field is 0, a mechanism > > > >> outside the scope of this document is used to obtain the > > > >> addresses used to establish the TCP connection. > > > >> > > > >> End of 3.2: > > > >> > > > >> OLD: > > > >> SCTP Connection ID AFI: The AFI value to describe the address- > > > >> family of the address of the SCTP Connection ID field. When this > > > >> field is 0, a mechanism outside the scope of this document is used > > > >> to obtain the addresses used to establish the SCTP connection. > > > >> > > > >> NEW: > > > >> SCTP Connection ID AFI: The AFI value to describe the address- > > > >> family of the address of the SCTP Connection ID field. Note that > > > >> this value does not need to match the address-family of the PIM > > > >> Hello message that carries it. When this field is 0, a mechanism > > > >> outside the scope of this document is used to obtain the > > > >> addresses used to establish the SCTP connection. > > > >> > > > >> What do you think? > > > > > > > > This works great. > > > > > > Great, I hope we can then just add a note for the editor, and that the > > > discuss can be cleared... > > > > > > Stig > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > Suresh > > >
- [Gen-art] Hello Russ ? [RE: Russ Housley's Discus… Adrian Farrel