Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Call review of draft-ietf-avtcore-multi-media-rtp-session-12

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Thu, 17 December 2015 12:48 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 622C31B2C1B for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 04:48:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a_pLE-EZpdPK for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 04:48:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AA6F1B2C07 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 04:48:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 202E62CCBF; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 14:48:26 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ioGvJDErZgKb; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 14:48:25 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69D992CCAE; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 14:48:25 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B207D6E3-A46D-4E62-A33C-BE95A6E26C7C"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.1
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <ABCAA4EF18F17B4FB619EA93DEF7939A454B5B36@eusaamb107.ericsson.se>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 14:48:25 +0200
Message-Id: <FB5F8965-9E88-4D10-BFFB-3614F5EDA189@piuha.net>
References: <ABCAA4EF18F17B4FB619EA93DEF7939A454B5B36@eusaamb107.ericsson.se>
To: Meral Shirazipour <meral.shirazipour@ericsson.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/jKrNlX7ZPQkD4GpylPm7puimAWg>
Cc: "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-avtcore-multi-media-rtp-session.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-avtcore-multi-media-rtp-session.all@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Call review of draft-ietf-avtcore-multi-media-rtp-session-12
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 12:48:29 -0000

Thank you very much for the review!

Authors, have you noted the comments & are taking action (if necessary)?

Jari

On 11 Dec 2015, at 21:14, Meral Shirazipour <meral.shirazipour@ericsson.com> wrote:

> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq .
> 
> Document:  draft-ietf-avtcore-multi-media-rtp-session-12
> Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour
> Review Date: 2015-12-11
> IETF LC End Date:  2015-12-09 (sorry for missed LC review-mistakenly reviewed some other draft)
> IESG Telechat date: 2015-12-17
> 
> 
> Summary:
> This draft is ready to be published as Standards Track RFC but I have some comments.
> 
> Major issues:
> 
> 
> Minor issues:
> 
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> -[Page 4], "Equal treatment of media" section.
> While reading this paragraph the question comes to mind of if all media flows get 'best effort' only or if all media flows could get e.g. 'Gold treatment', or something in between...
> It would be clearer to add a sentence to say how the treatment (QoS) is specified and applied to all flows.
> 
> -[Page 7], "This specifications purpose"----->"This specification's purpose"
> 
> -[Page 8], "It is important to note that the RTP payload type is never used to distinguish media streams."
> It would be clearer to add this would be explained below. "As expalined below, ..."
> 
> -[Page 9], "form a independent"--->"form an independent"
> 
> -[Page 11], "that FEC stream use"---->"that FEC stream uses"
> 
> -[Page 11,
> "(e.g., if an original RTP
>    session contains audio and video flows, for the associated FEC RTP
>    session where to use the "audio/ulpfec" and "video/ulpfec" payload
>    formats)
> "
> 
> This sentence may need revision, word "where" to be revised.
> 
> -[Page 11], "with a associated generic"---->"with an associated generic"
> 
> -[Page 11], ULP (uneven level protection) to spell out.
> 
> -[Page 12], "this requires each media type use" -----> "this requires each media type to use"
> 
> -[Page 14], some references are expired. Should they remain cited?
> [I-D.ietf-avtcore-multiplex-guidelines],  [I-D.lennox-payload-ulp-ssrc-mux]
> 
> 
> Best Regards,
> Meral
> ---
> Meral Shirazipour
> Ericsson
> Research
> www.ericsson.com
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art