[Gen-art] Re: IETF LC review: draft-creed-ogc-urn-03.txt
"Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Fri, 19 October 2007 17:31 UTC
Return-path: <gen-art-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Iivh8-0006O6-3N; Fri, 19 Oct 2007 13:31:34 -0400
Received: from gen-art by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Iivh7-0006NN-0F for gen-art-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2007 13:31:33 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Iivh6-0006N8-4w for gen-art@ietf.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2007 13:31:32 -0400
Received: from bender-mail.tigertech.net ([64.62.209.30]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Iivgx-0001Ol-1v for gen-art@ietf.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2007 13:31:32 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bender.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40A5A7DF9; Fri, 19 Oct 2007 10:31:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from JMHLap3.joelhalpern.com (jupiter.inet.qwest.net [67.133.255.125]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bender.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70A4A7E00; Fri, 19 Oct 2007 10:30:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 13:30:55 -0400
To: Mary Barnes <mary.barnes@nortel.com>, gen-art@ietf.org
From: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Subject: [Gen-art] Re: IETF LC review: draft-creed-ogc-urn-03.txt
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <20071019173058.70A4A7E00@bender.tigertech.net>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at tigertech.net
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.4 (2006-07-26) on bender.tigertech.net
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.3 tagged_above=-999.0 required=7.0 tests=MSGID_FROM_MTA_ID, SPF_NEUTRAL
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 82c9bddb247d9ba4471160a9a865a5f3
Cc: lisa@osafoundation.org, creed@opengeospatial.org
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org
I have looked at the -03 draft, and this resolves my concerns expressed below. This, I consider the gen-art summary to now read "This document is ready for publication as an Informational RFC." Thank you, Joel M. Halpern ----------------------------------------- I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: A URN namespace for the Open Geospatial Consortium Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 13-Oct-2007 IETF LC End Date: 22-Oct-2007 IESG Telechat date: (if known) N/A Summary: This document is nearly ready for publication as an Informational RFC. The following comment should be considered before publication. Comments: The document provides a clear description of the reason and basis for the registration. I am concerned that the document does not seem to provide a stable reference for how a user would find the list of defined OGC resources and the Resource Specific Strings. The description of the OGC process points to a Wiki page, and is merely an introduction. (As a minor note, if this reference is to be published in this RFC, then the OGC should plan on maintaining an informational page or link at that location even if the Wiki is restructured.) There is a description of a beta version of a resolver to provide the registry. As this is Beta, it is not clear if that is the stable and intended fashion for a user to examine the registry. So, while the document says that "The registration tables and information will be published and maintain by ONA on the OGC web site." I am concerned that this is not enough information. Note, as a reviewer who does not live in the URN world on a day-to-day basis, it is possible that I am asking too much of the registration. But usually IANA tables are supposed to be such that an outside user can find the registered values from the pointers at IANA. _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
- [Gen-art] Re: IETF LC review: draft-creed-ogc-urn… Joel M. Halpern