[Gen-art] 2119 section and RFC 8174
Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr> Mon, 09 October 2017 14:04 UTC
Return-Path: <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA70912008A for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Oct 2017 07:04:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gx-D2lKAaCt8 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Oct 2017 07:04:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from givry.fdupont.fr (givry.fdupont.fr [IPv6:2001:41d0:1:6d55:211:5bff:fe98:d51e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0285A13450B for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Oct 2017 07:04:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from givry.fdupont.fr (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by givry.fdupont.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id v99Diioh086664 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Oct 2017 15:44:44 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from dupont@givry.fdupont.fr)
Message-Id: <201710091344.v99Diioh086664@givry.fdupont.fr>
From: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2017 15:44:44 +0200
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/kS5fy55BOfaEECUJVwDH3jDlNT8>
Subject: [Gen-art] 2119 section and RFC 8174
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2017 14:04:45 -0000
RFC 8174 (Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words) published in May solved the lower case 2119 keyword issue but should we recommend draft authors to use the RFC 8174 updated standard section about the use of 2119 keywords? IMHO yes at it is the simplest. Note the RFC Editor should be implied in this discussion, for instance someone can ask this section to be updated before publication by the RFC Editor. Thanks Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr
- [Gen-art] 2119 section and RFC 8174 Francis Dupont
- Re: [Gen-art] 2119 section and RFC 8174 Dale R. Worley