IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-core-block-19

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Fri, 29 April 2016 18:30 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFCFD12D6EF; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 11:30:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ayp2ibUkAjhA; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 11:30:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net (relay6-d.mail.gandi.net [IPv6:2001:4b98:c:538::198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C027F12D6EC; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 11:30:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mfilter35-d.gandi.net (mfilter35-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.166]) by relay6-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44B5EFB8AC; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 20:30:12 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter35-d.gandi.net
Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net ([IPv6:::ffff:217.70.183.198]) by mfilter35-d.gandi.net (mfilter35-d.gandi.net [::ffff:10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BILbbplxZaXP; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 20:30:10 +0200 (CEST)
X-Originating-IP: 93.199.242.26
Received: from nar-3.local (p5DC7F21A.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.199.242.26]) (Authenticated sender: cabo@cabo.im) by relay6-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 877A3FB89F; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 20:30:09 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <5723A831.9030603@tzi.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 20:30:09 +0200
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 4.0.8 (Macintosh/20151105)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: jouni.nospam@gmail.com
References: <57155CB7.5090508@gmail.com> <571872A2.8090008@tzi.org> <571E591F.6090409@gmail.com> <57213036.8090905@tzi.org> <57238ACC.5090905@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <57238ACC.5090905@gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2.3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/ksjt0FTaOOEaJeKxJHHlJ4VWIRo>
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, draft-ietf-core-block.all@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-core-block-19
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 18:30:17 -0000

Jouni Korhonen wrote:
> Hi Jouni,
> 
> Just saying.. the use of NUM was not crystal clear just by reading the
> draft and not having the followed the core block development &
> discussion past few years.

Right.  I'm not sure I have fully addressed this one; all your other
comments should be addressed in draft-ietf-core-block-20.

Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-core-block-20

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email