[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ippm-more-twamp-01

Avshalom Houri <AVSHALOM@il.ibm.com> Mon, 18 May 2009 09:57 UTC

Return-Path: <AVSHALOM@il.ibm.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E02FC28B797 for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 May 2009 02:57:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.678
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.678 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.320, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_75=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sk7wQqFMIHxH for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 May 2009 02:57:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mtagate1.de.ibm.com (mtagate1.de.ibm.com [195.212.17.161]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 988FC3A685F for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 May 2009 02:57:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.167.49]) by mtagate1.de.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n4I9xRcQ011881 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 May 2009 09:59:27 GMT
Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.165.228]) by d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.2) with ESMTP id n4I9xRBX3797100 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 May 2009 11:59:27 +0200
Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n4I9xRKs007059 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 May 2009 11:59:27 +0200
Received: from d12mc102.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12mc102.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.167.114]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n4I9xRvr007055; Mon, 18 May 2009 11:59:27 +0200
To: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, acmorton@att.com, khedayat@exfo.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-KeepSent: 0004EF7B:1EE769FC-C22575BA:00347DDF; type=4; name=$KeepSent
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.5 December 05, 2008
From: Avshalom Houri <AVSHALOM@il.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <OF0004EF7B.1EE769FC-ONC22575BA.00347DDF-C22575BA.0036DFCE@il.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 12:59:22 +0300
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D12MC102/12/M/IBM(Release 8.5|December 05, 2008) at 18/05/2009 12:59:26, Serialize complete at 18/05/2009 12:59:26
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 0036DD34C22575BA_="
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ippm-more-twamp-01
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 09:58:00 -0000

  I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html ).

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-ippm-more-twamp-01.txt
            More Features for the Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol - 
TWAMP
Reviewer: Avshalom Houri
Review Date: 18-May-2009
IETF LC End Date: 19-May-2009
IESG Telechat date: N/A

Summary: The document is ready for publication as a standards track RFC

Major issues: none
Minor issues: none

Few typos:

lines 177-178
   recommendations for new features in TWAMP.  There are a growing
   number TWAMP implementations at present, and wide-spread usage is
->
   recommendations for new features in TWAMP.  There is a growing
   number of TWAMP implementations at present, and wide-spread usage is


line 358 - CONTROL,value -> CONTROL, value
line 368 - CONTROL,value -> CONTROL, value

line 416 - "IETF Consensus" -> "IETF Review". IANA comment: 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/idtracker/draft-ietf-ippm-more-twamp/comment/95487/


Thanks
--Avshalom