Re: [Gen-art] Genart review of draft-ietf-pim-rfc4601-update-survey-report-02.txt

"Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang" <zzhang@juniper.net> Fri, 13 September 2013 00:42 UTC

Return-Path: <zzhang@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 386E811E8136 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 17:42:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.092
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.092 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.454, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.96]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qOFr-+LKntZk for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 17:41:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from db8outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (mail-db8lp0184.outbound.messaging.microsoft.com [213.199.154.184]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5902611E80DC for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 17:41:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail118-db8-R.bigfish.com (10.174.8.227) by DB8EHSOBE022.bigfish.com (10.174.4.85) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.22; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 00:41:53 +0000
Received: from mail118-db8 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail118-db8-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2DAA3E0420; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 00:41:52 +0000 (UTC)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.56.240.101; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:BL2PRD0510HT002.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI
X-SpamScore: -25
X-BigFish: VPS-25(zz9371Ic85fh11f6Nzz1f42h208ch1ee6h1de0h1fdah2073h1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ah1fc6hzz1d7338h1de098h1033IL17326ah18c673h1c8fb4h1de097h186068h8275bh8275dhz2fh2a8h839hd24hf0ah1288h12a5h12bdh137ah1441h1504h1537h153bh162dh1631h1758h18e1h1946h19b5h19ceh1ad9h1b0ah1bceh1d07h1d0ch1d2eh1d3fh1de9h1dfeh1dffh1e1dh1fe8h1ff5h20f0h9a9j1155h)
Received-SPF: pass (mail118-db8: domain of juniper.net designates 157.56.240.101 as permitted sender) client-ip=157.56.240.101; envelope-from=zzhang@juniper.net; helo=BL2PRD0510HT002.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ; .outlook.com ;
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report-Untrusted: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(45984002)(199002)(189002)(377454003)(4396001)(47736001)(18717965001)(46102001)(81342001)(74706001)(63696002)(49866001)(81816001)(80022001)(66066001)(81542001)(76576001)(76796001)(76786001)(50986001)(47976001)(81686001)(69226001)(65816001)(19580395003)(83322001)(19580405001)(83072001)(74316001)(19300405004)(15202345003)(76482001)(59766001)(54316002)(56776001)(79102001)(74366001)(77982001)(77096001)(51856001)(56816003)(74876001)(54356001)(53806001)(19609705001)(16236675002)(31966008)(33646001)(80976001)(47446002)(74502001)(15975445006)(74662001)(24736002); DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2PR05MB079; H:BY2PR05MB079.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; CLIP:66.129.232.2; RD:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
Received: from mail118-db8 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail118-db8 (MessageSwitch) id 137903285575525_16679; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 00:40:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from DB8EHSMHS029.bigfish.com (unknown [10.174.8.241]) by mail118-db8.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7504C00FA; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 00:40:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from BL2PRD0510HT002.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (157.56.240.101) by DB8EHSMHS029.bigfish.com (10.174.4.39) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.227.3; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 00:40:52 +0000
Received: from BY2PR05MB079.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.242.38.16) by BL2PRD0510HT002.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.255.100.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.353.4; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 00:40:46 +0000
Received: from BY2PR05MB079.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.242.38.16) by BY2PR05MB079.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.242.38.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.745.25; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 00:40:43 +0000
Received: from BY2PR05MB079.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.8.110]) by BY2PR05MB079.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.8.110]) with mapi id 15.00.0745.000; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 00:40:43 +0000
From: "Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang" <zzhang@juniper.net>
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
Thread-Topic: Genart review of draft-ietf-pim-rfc4601-update-survey-report-02.txt
Thread-Index: Ac6u1whJp5p8nVk+QVGn+1zNCRwLvgBQZF8Q
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 00:40:42 +0000
Message-ID: <8c1649bf24244235a6e33c5e25d9a012@BY2PR05MB079.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C49F1F5@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C49F1F5@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [66.129.232.2]
x-forefront-prvs: 0968D37274
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_8c1649bf24244235a6e33c5e25d9a012BY2PR05MB079namprd05pro_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn%
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 17:44:12 -0700
Cc: "draft-ietf-pim-rfc4601-update-survey-report.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pim-rfc4601-update-survey-report.all@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart review of draft-ietf-pim-rfc4601-update-survey-report-02.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 00:42:03 -0000

Christer,

Sorry for not responding earlier.
Thank you very much for the review and comments. They all make sense. We will fix them and post a new version (per direction from Stig/Adrian as you suggested).

Jeffrey

From: Christer Holmberg [mailto:christer.holmberg@ericsson.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 6:27 AM
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-pim-rfc4601-update-survey-report.all@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Genart review of draft-ietf-pim-rfc4601-update-survey-report-02.txt


I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.



Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.



Document:                         draft-ietf-pim-rfc4601-update-survey-report-02.txt

Reviewer:                           Christer Holmberg

Review Date:                     11 September 2013

IETF LC End Date:             3 September, 2013

IESG Telechat date:         12 September, 2013



Summary:           The document is otherwise ready for publication, but contains some editorial issues that I suggest that the authors address.



Major issues: -



Minor issues: -



Nits/editorial comments:



General:



Q_GEN_1:           The RFC referencing is done in an inconsistent way: sometimes [RFC XXXX], sometimes (RFC XXXX), and sometimes RFC XXXX. I suggest to always use [RFC XXXX], OR to use [RFC XXXX] at the first occurrence, and then RFC XXXX.





Q_GEN_2:           The document mixes "PIM-SM" and "PIM Sparse-Mode" terminology. I suggest to use consistent terminology.



Section 2.2:



Q_2-2_1:             s/"five other anonymous operators"/ "five anonymous operators"





Section 2.2.1:



Q_2-2-1_1:         I suggest to replace "In the last fourteen years" with "Since <insert the year you are referencing>".





Section 2.3:



Q_2-3_1:             I suggest to replace "Eight vendors have reported PIM Sparse-Mode implementations" with "Eight vendors responded to the survey", to be consistent with the wording in section 2.2.





Section 6:



Q_6_1: Why is the section number needed? Why simply not call it "Appendix A. Questionnaire"?





Regards,



Christer