Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-grow-bmp-15

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Wed, 14 October 2015 23:32 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5510E1A2119; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 16:32:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TtshIYPjQI2t; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 16:32:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B27561A1EED; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 16:32:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BDE72CC6C; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 02:32:43 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E84Gdp9qXg-i; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 02:32:41 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33EF52CC6B; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 02:32:41 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_9A23EBED-E3BA-4455-A82C-7A506CE1F6D8"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.1
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <561ECDCE.5000704@bell-labs.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 02:32:37 +0300
Message-Id: <9FB64BA8-CFE3-4CE4-B84C-1E085D42C45D@piuha.net>
References: <561ECDCE.5000704@bell-labs.com>
To: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/lm1yNklyIHDw6haSuGQg5qZCPVc>
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-grow-bmp.chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-grow-bmp.ad@ietf.org, draft-ietf-grow-bmp@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-grow-bmp-15
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 23:32:47 -0000

Thanks for the review, Vijay. Good questions. Do the authors have an answer?

Jari

On 15 Oct 2015, at 00:49, Vijay K. Gurbani <vkg@bell-labs.com> wrote:

> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
> you may receive.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-grow-bmp-15
> Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani
> Review Date: Oct-14-2015
> IETF LC End Date: Not known
> IESG Telechat date: Oct-15-2015
> 
> This document is ready as a Proposed Standard with two minor nits.
> 
> Major: 0
> Minor: 2
> Nits:  0
> 
> Minor:
> - S3.2,, first paragraph: "No message is ever sent from the monitoring
>   station to the monitored router."
> You mean "No BMP message is ever sent from the monitoring station to
> the monitored router."?  I suspect that the monitoring station can send
> TCP messages (SYN, ACK, etc.) to the monitored router in order to open
> up the TCP connection, no?
> 
> - S3.2, last paragraph: "If the monitoring station intends to end or
>   restart BMP processing, it simply drops the connection, optionally
>   with a Termination message."
> The monitoring station cannot send a (BMP?) message to the monitored
> router, right?  If so, I don't understand the utility of the
> Termination method above.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> - vijay
> --
> Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
> 1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA)
> Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / vijay.gurbani@alcatel-lucent.com
> Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/  | Calendar: http://goo.gl/x3Ogq
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art