[Gen-art] Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-mcgrew-aes-gmac-esp-01.txt

Hi Spencer,

On Dec 8, 2005, at 1:42 PM, Spencer Dawkins wrote:

> I was selected as General Area Review Team reviewer for this  
> specification
> (for background on Gen-ART, please see
> http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
>
> Summary: this specification is mostly ready for publication as a  
> Proposed Standard. I do have one question, which is probably due to  
> my own ignorance.
>
> The document defines AES-GMAC Additional Authenticated Data (AAD)  
> with either 32-bit sequence numbers or 64-bit extended sequence  
> numbers, but it was not obvious to me how a receiver parsing this  
> field would know whether to interpret the field as 32-bit or 64-bit  
> extended sequence numbers. If this is obvious to everyone in the  
> security community, my apologies, but it might be nice to add a  
> sentence like "The use of extended sequence numbers can be detected  
> by ...".

that's a good point.  I think that it would be good to cite the  
specific of the ESN option (Section 2.2.1 of draft-ietf-ipsec-esp- 
v3-10.txt) at the point where the spec first mentions it.

David

>
> Thanks,
>
> Spencer

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art