Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-anima-stable-connectivity-07

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Thu, 11 January 2018 14:36 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69F5112EB95; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 06:36:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=HSFndVlM; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=o4pBIWaq
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SKgqiPV_bd8K; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 06:36:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4048A12EB84; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 06:36:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 810DA20DC6; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 09:36:35 -0500 (EST)
Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 11 Jan 2018 09:36:35 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=JUzL5pHEJBDojE87Vpi3RkN5w+I0Q YdfmOIx2Ojpk+Y=; b=HSFndVlMN4j42VQylik4DfpCDuhbLt+hOV3gpQRazLPsh CaCYxr7YLX2i4gqr+WGCW6PA4llY1Vo+ZMXDV7Xv0o9eAHn2TgoxIq3Izd6MYAHN L3h+8hTUZ3d/D+kcnXbix/aAhiw7DZDZBmaG1OcXgh+LdQ9sQCjQpvofxhieFx+m Cw007R4UBVF9Rbl+PU2ub5wXmVA0lQtGkErcE0bn5WdHzcTBd4AzdyTRgRcnGHPp WxHFXnbFz+E+N0yIrB2fzuoo0fOVu6WjnUFy1IVnm+uhoHRdR1H8/mf8Zef3ujcR bzPfJI9bR3F5Nnpbp6utxu9wrbEu1sPbllFn8/Ibw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=JUzL5p HEJBDojE87Vpi3RkN5w+I0QYdfmOIx2Ojpk+Y=; b=o4pBIWaqDoKN28x4vQdB6h BeQZpWQNG95HBfKP9SOn7CqNFrOok/4q70/+RswrFg1djWxKWldGSjTNKc86pDDS 62EyanZzJ7KXHAo8Y/MSKcvkkkcaKiD0cZq6uP49/d5N1hwd+DoblyRz81JzJZXs 16r1qhWPZ77AMROMqJrf6czmHIV3joYtgeLgkon78OFOfrn7EBUjiG+rWbOOS38C mfoFwzf7J6ppOqD3pXMT8WsM2vFo9/A8P9T3f8rBbWxMdH7rtERJ04znV+sxlXXA wnmiyiozQJObfWcLw4HA876sbMKrH7DztRzxXBUe5faBZ5xzhAW+smVOeN9XdRPA ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:c3ZXWpo0ZGO3GrjEk4d8iqZ2CbcPGESKxI6WVI-UwEkkYCNyc3Irgg>
Received: from sjc-alcoop-8812.cisco.com (unknown [128.107.241.179]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7EA2A24599; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 09:36:34 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <151172929363.16112.9800241520992164052@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 09:36:32 -0500
Cc: gen-art <gen-art@ietf.org>, anima@ietf.org, draft-ietf-anima-stable-connectivity.all@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2AAF0CB9-E081-40EB-ACC5-C752708BFCD1@cooperw.in>
References: <151172929363.16112.9800241520992164052@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Matthew Miller <linuxwolf+ietf@outer-planes.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/pQ1jmJpYTRYNG8WGjld3av3ooqQ>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-anima-stable-connectivity-07
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 14:36:38 -0000

Matt, thanks for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot and asked for your nits to be addressed.

Alissa

> On Nov 26, 2017, at 3:48 PM, Matthew Miller <linuxwolf+ietf@outer-planes.net> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Matthew Miller
> Review result: Ready with Nits
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-anima-stable-connectivity-07
> Reviewer: Matthew A. Miller
> Review Date: 2017-11-26
> IETF LC End Date: 2017-11-26
> IESG Telechat date: N/A
> 
> Summary:
> 
> This document is ready to be published as informational, but there are
> a number of nits that ought be addressed before final publication.
> 
> Overall, the document is 
> 
> Major issues:  NONE
> 
> Minor issues:  NONE
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> 
> * Throughout, there is a mix of the term "data plane" and "data-plane".
>  One form should be chosen and the rest corrected to match.
> 
> * In Section 1.2. "Data Communications Networks (DCNs)", first
>  paragraph; "'th" should be "'s" (or just "s"): "In the late
>  1990'th and ..." should be "In the late 1990s and ...".
> 
> * In Section 1.2. "Data Communications Networks (DCNs)", first
>  paragraph; the word "where" should be "were" in the fragment
>  "These where (and still are) ...".
> 
> * In Section 1.2. "Data Communications Networks (DCNs)", first
>  paragraph; there is a missing "a" between "are" and "separate" in
>  the fragment "they are separate network entirely".
> 
> * In Section 2.1.1. "Simple Connectivity for Non-ACP capable NMS
>  Hosts", first paragraph; there is a mismatch in plurality in the
>  third sentence; instead of:
> 
>  """
>  They acts as the default router to those NMS hosts and provide them
>  with IPv6 connectivity into the ACP.
>  """
> 
>  it should be:
> 
>  """
>  They act as the default routers to those NMS hosts and provide them
>  with IPv6 connectivity into the ACP.
>  """
> 
> * In Section 2.1.3. "Simultaneous ACP and Data Plane Connectivity",
>  last paragraph; the following sentence seems to be missing a word
>  or two:
> 
>  """
>  If the secure ACP was extendable via untrusted routers then it would
>  be a lot more verify the secure domain assertion.
>  """
> 
> * In Section 2.1.4. "IPv4-only NMS Hosts", second paragraph after the
>  ordered list; the word "thought" should be "through" in the fragment
>  "... be reachable thought the IPv6/IPv4 ...".
> 
> * In Section 2.1.5. "Path Selection Policies", fourth paragraph from
>  the section's end; there is an extra "of" between "shaping" and "at":
> 
>  """
>  Traffic policing and/or shaping of at the ACP edge in the NOC can be
>  used to throttle applications such as software download into the ACP.
>  """
> 
> * In Section 2.2. "Stable Connectivity for Distributed Network/OAM",
>  second paragraph; there is a missing "to" between "start" and
>  "provide" in the fragment "... tried to start provide common ...".
> 
> * In Section 2.2. "Stable Connectivity for Distributed Network/OAM",
>  second paragraph; the word "applicable" should be "applied" in the
>  fragment "... how ell it applicable to a ...".
> 
> * In Section 3.1. "No IPv4 for ACP", third paragraph; the word "as"
>  should be "to" in the fragment "... from a native transport as just
>  a service on the edge."
> 
> * In Section 3.1. "No IPv4 for ACP", last paragraph; the word "type"
>  should be "types" in the fragment "In other type of networks as
>  well, ...".
> 
> * In Section 3.1. "No IPv4 for ACP", last paragraph; the word "support"
>  should be "supported" in the fragment "... family will be support so
>  all use...".
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art