Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-reschke-webdav-mount-04.txt
Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com> Mon, 31 July 2006 12:58 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G7XLg-0007GG-1S; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 08:58:20 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G7XLf-0007GA-KK for gen-art@ietf.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 08:58:19 -0400
Received: from mtagate3.uk.ibm.com ([195.212.29.136]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G7XLe-0004mV-77 for gen-art@ietf.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 08:58:19 -0400
Received: from d06nrmr1407.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06nrmr1407.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.38.185]) by mtagate3.uk.ibm.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id k6VCwGY1107698 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 13:58:17 +0100
Received: from d06av01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.212]) by d06nrmr1407.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.13.6/NCO/VER7.0) with ESMTP id k6VCxxR4138446 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 13:59:59 +0100
Received: from d06av01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d06av01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k6VCwGG6027630 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 13:58:16 +0100
Received: from sihl.zurich.ibm.com (sihl.zurich.ibm.com [9.4.16.232]) by d06av01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k6VCwFIQ027623; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 13:58:15 +0100
Received: from zurich.ibm.com (sig-9-146-216-108.de.ibm.com [9.146.216.108]) by sihl.zurich.ibm.com (AIX4.3/8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA173974; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 14:58:15 +0200
Message-ID: <44CDFE68.5020007@zurich.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 14:58:16 +0200
From: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>
Organization: IBM
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113
X-Accept-Language: en, fr, de
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Scott W Brim <swb@employees.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-reschke-webdav-mount-04.txt
References: <20060625142052.GA144@sbrim-wxp01>
In-Reply-To: <20060625142052.GA144@sbrim-wxp01>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d6b246023072368de71562c0ab503126
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org
If you interpret HTTP as
How To Traverse Phirewalls
the architectural issue seems to vanish :-)
Brian
Scott W Brim wrote:
> Sent just to gen-art.
>
> Without investigating whether HTTP for remote file management and
> editing is something the IETF should condone, or investigating and
> critiquing the whole webdav architecture ... given the assumed
> environment, it is consistent and clean. Ready.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
>
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
- [Gen-art] review of draft-reschke-webdav-mount-04… Scott W Brim
- Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-reschke-webdav-moun… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-reschke-webdav-moun… Scott W Brim