[Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-ippm-model-based-metrics-11

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Tue, 25 July 2017 21:06 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-ippm-model-based-metrics.all@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, ippm@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <150101679673.26268.16147768864334508872@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 14:06:36 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/qWAPodQInsrkIJr3KuRKk1I3cvQ>
Subject: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-ippm-model-based-metrics-11

Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready with Nits

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-ippm-model-based-metrics-11
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review Date: 2017-07-25
IETF LC End Date: 2017-03-14
IESG Telechat date: 2017-08-03

Summary: Ready with nits

Thanks for addressing the comments in my review of -10.
In the revision (as a side-effect of removing the dependency on 2119, I
suspect) you removed the classification of normative vs informative references.
I think you mean that all of these references are Informative. (The document
would have a References section, with one "Informative References" subsection).

[Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-ip… Robert Sparks