[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-mptcp-api-06

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Mon, 12 November 2012 21:48 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF40921F8614; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 13:48:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DVtdDy3PXS8X; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 13:48:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shaman.nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEC3921F85EA; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 13:48:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.12.11.26] ([4.30.77.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by shaman.nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id qACLmBlo077546 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:48:12 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:48:11 -0600
Message-Id: <F8E095B8-9E98-4986-80B5-7C498BC07733@nostrum.com>
To: "<draft-ietf-mptcp-api.all@tools.ietf.org>" <draft-ietf-mptcp-api.all@tools.ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
Received-SPF: pass (nostrum.com: 4.30.77.1 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Cc: "gen-art@ietf.org Review Team" <gen-art@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org List" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-mptcp-api-06
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 21:48:19 -0000

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
< http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-mptcp-api-06
Reviewer: Ben Campbell	
Review Date: 2012-11-12
IESG Telechat date: 2012-11-15

Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication as an informational RFC. All of the comments from my Gen-ART review of version 05 at IETF last call have been dealt with to my satisfaction in the draft or in email, save the one minor issue below.

Major issues:

Minor issues:

I made the following comment at last call. It's not a show stopper, but I think it should be considered:

> -- It seems like at least passing knowledge of the sockets API is needed to understand this document. I'm curious why the POSIX reference is informational rather than normative?

The authors indicated they believed the reference at the end of paragraph 3 of section 1 to be truly informational. However, I called out an mention at the beginning of the same paragraph that should have included a citation, and that I thought that citation would justify a normative reference. The authors added the citation in version 06, but the reference is still informational.


Nits/editorial comments:

IDNits reports that "A later version (-12) exists of
     draft-ietf-mptcp-multiaddressed-09"