[Gen-art] Re: review of draft-ietf-avt-ulp-21.txt

Adam Li <adamli@hyervision.com> Fri, 16 March 2007 15:18 UTC

Return-path: <gen-art-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HSEC3-0003Mb-3A; Fri, 16 Mar 2007 11:18:11 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HSDeO-0000rh-Ca for gen-art@ietf.org; Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:43:24 -0400
Received: from 206-225-85-160.dedicated.abac.net ([206.225.85.160] helo=server.zchannels.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HSDeM-0007cu-Vd for gen-art@ietf.org; Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:43:24 -0400
Received: from [192.168.142.102] (rrcs-67-52-150-122.west.biz.rr.com [67.52.150.122]) (authenticated bits=0) by server.zchannels.com (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l2GEe0w0053235 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 16 Mar 2007 06:40:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from adamli@hyervision.com)
Message-ID: <45FAACEB.6060803@hyervision.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 07:42:51 -0700
From: Adam Li <adamli@hyervision.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
References: <200703161217.l2GCHeWS005509@tao.fdupont.fr>
In-Reply-To: <200703161217.l2GCHeWS005509@tao.fdupont.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: f607d15ccc2bc4eaf3ade8ffa8af02a0
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 11:18:09 -0400
Cc: fluffy@cisco.com, gen-art@ietf.org
Subject: [Gen-art] Re: review of draft-ietf-avt-ulp-21.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org

Hi Francis,

Thank you very much for the summary. I will put them together with other
changes we would like to make for the RFC editors.

Thanks,

Adam



Francis Dupont wrote:
> I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
> reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
> http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
>
> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
> you may receive.
>
>
> Document: draft-ietf-avt-ulp-21.txt
> Reviewer: Francis Dupont
> Review Date:  2007-03-15
> IETF LC End Date: 2007-04-03
> IESG Telechat date: unknown
>
> Summary: Ready
>
> Comments: I have only a few minor editorial comments (which should be handled
> by the RFC editor):
>  - 5 page 8 (section title): the usage is to put no space before a colon ":"
>  in English. BTW I believe the best should be:
>  "5. Uneven Level Protection (ULP)"
>
>  - 5 page 8: In stead -> Instead ?
>
>  - 7.3 page 11: in
>   "The P recovery field, the X recovery field, the CC recovery field,
>    the M recovery field, and the PT recovery field are obtained via the
>    protection operation applied to the P, X, CC, M, and PT values of
>    the media packets associated with the FEC packet."
>   it should be fine to add the P, X, ... and PT are names of RTP fields.
>
>  - 11 page 28: a word seems to miss in
>   "The changing of encryption keys is another crucial issue needs to be
>    addressed."
>
>  - 17 pages 39 and 40: I know where the problem (again) comes from so
>   I don't expect a solution for this document in particular:
>    * to put a status like "(Proposed Standard)" is not standard
>    * for a BCP the BCP number should be added
>    * RFC 3388 has no status (it is right but not as the others?)
>   So the RFC editor will have to reformat the references...
>
> Regards
>
> Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr
>
> PS: I have not checked all the numerical examples (not a job for a human :-).
>   

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art