[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-meadors-multiple-attachments-ediint-10

Pete McCann <mccap@petoni.org> Fri, 25 February 2011 23:35 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 17:35:57 -0600
Message-ID: <AANLkTinRogFf2udbKuYsTJNhppko-XPawaW-q_RG72Jf@mail.gmail.com>
From: Pete McCann <mccap@petoni.org>
To: gen-art@ietf.org, draft-meadors-multiple-attachments-ediint.all@tools.ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-meadors-multiple-attachments-ediint-10
Precedence: list

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
< http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

Document: draft-meadors-multiple-attachments-ediint-10
Reviewer:  Peter McCann
Review Date:  2011-02-25
IETF LC End Date:
IESG Telechat date: 2011-03-03

Summary:  Ready, one question

Major issues:

Minor issues:

The MIC and signature algorithms seem to duplicate some of what
S/MIME does.  Is there a reason S/MIME couldn't have been used?

Nits/editorial comments:

Abstract:
   message were designed
SHOULD BE:
   messages were designed

Section 2.2:
   To indicate support for MA,
MA should be expanded on first use.

Section 2.3:
MIC should be expanded on first use.  (Assume this is "Message Integrity Check")

Section 2.5:
   envelop
SHOULD BE:
   envelope

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-meador… Pete McCann